Friday, July 28, 2023

Review of Ancient Greece: From Beginning To End by Stephan Weaver

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   


Watch Short Review

Excerpts

“The Archaic Period was the epoch that ushered in the Republics, supplanting the Monarchies.  It was also the period that bore the institution of laws (Draco’s reforms in Athens), pottery and sculpture peculiar to Greece and the minting of the first coins.  The great Panathenaeic Festival was also instituted.  All these laudable developments paved the way for the emergence and the glory of the Classical Period of Greece” – Stephan Weaver, Chapter II, Page 7

“During the Classical period, Greece reached the summit of its glory and took the world by its breath.  It was the time in which modern thinking, art, literature, science and philosophy, began to take their first steps; it was when democracy literary took its first breath; the Classical era was the extraordinary period that gave life to the greatest thinkers of our world – Socrates, Plato, Aristotle where but a few.” – Stephan Weaver, Chapter III, Page 14

“The Hellenistic Period of Greece began in 323 BC following Alexander the Great’s death and ended in 31 BC after the invasion of the Roman Republic.  The period is characterized by the spread of Greek civilization, thinking, language and more throughout the whole of the eastern Mediterranean region, and Southwest Asia.” – Stephan Weaver, Chapter IV, Page 21


Review

Is This An Overview?

Ancient Greece had gone through various political changes.  Removing the monarchy in favor of a republic.  Developing a democracy.  The earlier cultural developments set foundations that enabled the later cultural successes.  A culture that enabled the rise of various world renown philosophers that changed how people think.  A culture bound to mythical sentiments.  Greek culture was acknowledged as valuable by other states.  Alexander the Great expanded Greek culture, which others further spread during the Hellenistic Period.  The fall of Ancient Greece was partly due to the Roman Empire, which had undermined Ancient Greece’s sovereignty.  The Greek kingdoms lacked the unity needed to defend themselves. 

 

Caveats?

A very short book about a long period of time.  The book introduces the reader to Ancient Greece, tempting the reader into searching for more information about Ancient Greece.  The shortness of the book means that there are a lot of details missing.  The details presented are simplified.  The simplified details can misrepresent events.  


Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•What were the political changes in Ancient Greece?
•What were the cultural changes in Ancient Greece?
•How did Ancient Greece influence the contemporary world?
•How did Alexander the Great influence Greek culture?
•How did the Roman Empire effect Greece?
•What caused the Greek kingdoms decline? 
•What is a tyrant in Ancient Greece? 
•What are the Olympic games?

Book Details
Publisher:             Stephan Weaver
Edition ISBN:      2940154920251
Pages to read:       30
Publication:          2017
1st Edition:           2017
Format:                 eBook 

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    5
Content          1
Overall          1






Monday, July 24, 2023

Review of The End of Gender: Debunking the Myths about Sex and Identity in Our Society by Debra Soh

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Genre = Sociology
Book Club Event = Book List (02/10/2024)
Intriguing Connections = 1) Relationships, Right?, 2) The Evolution of Evolution


Watch Short Review

Excerpts

Biological sex is either male or female.  Contrary to what is commonly believed, sex is defined not by chromosomes or our genitals or hormonal profiles, but by gametes, which are mature reproductive cells.  There are only two types of gametes: small ones called sperm that are produced by males, and large ones called eggs that are produced by females.  There are no intermediate types of gametes between egg and sperm cells.  Sex is therefore binary.  It is not a spectrum.” – Debra Soh, Myth #1: Biological Sex Is A Spectrum, Page 14

“Scientific studies have confirmed sex differences in the brain that lead to differences in our interests and behavior.  These differences are not due to the postnatal environment or societal messaging.  Gender is indeed biological and not due to socialization.” – Debra Soh, Myth #2: Gender Is A Social Construct, Page 32

“Indeed, gender identity is not the same thing as sexuality, but the two are linked, and just to add further confusion to the discussion, sexual orientation is biological, but the way it expresses itself in relation to gender is influenced by social factors.” – Debra Soh, Myth #4: Sexual Orientation And Gender Identity Are Unrelated, Page 72


Review

Is This An Overview?

Gender and sex are not the same, although many say gender when they mean sex.  Biological sex is determined by gametes, not chromosomes or genitals.  Gametes are mature reproductive cells, and there are only two types of gametes.  Sperm produced by males, and eggs produced by females.  Making sex binary.  Intersex individuals are born with male and female sexual anatomy.  But intersex people produce only a single type of gamete.

Gender identity is the relation between how the individual perceives themselves and their sex.  Whether the individual feels masculine or feminine.  Gender expression is how gender identity is externally expressed.  Hormonal exposure in the womb influences gender identity.  Making gender a biological product.  Along with sexual attraction.  Socialization influences what gender aspects can be expressed or suppressed, but not the individual’s preferences for masculine or feminine traits. 

The terms, what they mean, and their implications has received a lot of attraction, often not the wanted kind.  Opposing views that perceive the science and social values differently.  Sparking conflict, and confusion.  Confusion fueled by the spread of misinformation that has negative consequences on the vulnerable people who are seeking help.  What is needed is to treat everyone with respect, no matter their biological aspects, sexual proclivities, or gender identity.

 

How Does Politics Effect Biology?

Biology has been subsumed into politics and social media.  Used as a tool of power rather than informational discovery.  Seeking justice is not enough, for those who power is against are punished.  People have lost their jobs, along with mental and physical safety.  Science is being suppressed even in academia.  Scientists are willing to lie for political favor.  Everyone else is hurt by not knowing the value of information.

There are even consequences of seeking information.  No matter why or what the individual thinks about the ideas, they are punished.  Seeking information about biology has become a threat to those in power.

Historically, there were many links between biology and sex that were incorrect, such as making the claim that women are less intellectually competent.  But, even with more refined biological understanding and how biology effects the human being, biology is still stigmatized. 

Science is meant to consider different opposing sides, rather than just one.  As a sex researcher, the author wanted to combat sexual stigma and shame. 

 

Are There Sex Differences?

There are sex differences in the brain.  Differences that lead to people having different interests and behaviors.  Biology, rather than socialization.  As different sexes have different interests, they gravitate to different occupations.  The gender hiring gap can be created through biology influencing interests rather than discrimination. 

Equality between the sexes does not require each to be treated the same.  Women can make their own decisions.

 

Should Someone Change Gender’s Or Transition Their Sex?

People can identify, or misidentify, their gender for social benefits such as to get dates.  Gender identity has become a way of belonging to a community, rather than reflecting their own ideas.  The problem with gender is not that its binary, the problem is that people stereotype based on gender. 

People should have the same opportunities, but that does not mean that physical characteristics of people are the same.  Transitioning one’s sex, does not change the physical biological characteristics.  Males transitioning to female, do not lose their physical advantages, even with hormonal therapy.  

Parents are pressured to have their children transition, for their children’s safety even though transitioning does not have the expected results.  Children can feel discomfort in their bodies, but then become comfortable in them as they grow up. 

Children are not allowed to make various choices because they lack the emotional and intellectual skills to make life-altering decisions.  Yet people still try to have children transition early. 

 

Caveats?

This is a sensitive and polarizing topic.  The author shares consequences of expressing certain views in this book.  A theme of the book is what makes science, and how scientific views in the book are under attack.  The problem is that the way the author approaches these topics, knowing the sensitivity of the issues, can be inappropriate.  The author reciprocates the opposition’s high disapproval with high disapproval, which can prevent the opposition from consider the ideas in the book. 

Although there is science in the book, the interpretations of the findings have varying qualities.  A theme of the book is that biology determines sex and gender, rather than social values.  But the distinction between biology and social values are not given enough consideration, specifically the impact of culture on biological inclinations.  The author acknowledges that the brain has neuroplasticity, but sees the function as very limited.  There is other research indicating that culture can override genetic inclinations.  


Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•What is sex?
•What is gender?
•What are gametes?
•Who are the intersex?
•How much does biology influence sex and gender?
•What does culture effect?
•What is science meant to be and how the science of sex gets treated?
•Are different occupational choices due to discrimination? 
•Should someone transition? 
•How many different types of genders are there? 
•Why do people identify a specific gender? 
•Why did the author abandon the academic field?
•How does a blank slate perspective effect discrimination? 
•How much can neuroplasticity influence people? 
•Is the author feminist?
•What are the benefits and consequence of gender-neutral spaces? 
•How are people sexually selected? 
•What is intrasexual competition? 

Book Details
Edition:                 First Threshold Editions
Publisher:             Threshold Editions [Simon & Schuster]
Edition ISBN:      9781982132538
Pages to read:       199
Publication:          2020
1st Edition:           2020
Format:                 eBook 

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    5
Content          4
Overall          4






Thursday, July 20, 2023

Review of 1812 by Anthony Mastro

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 


Watch Short Review

Excerpts

“The four of them ate mostly in silence only asking general questions.  “I don’t think that it is a good idea for you and Jenny to stay here any longer.”  Said John and Thomas Agreed.  “The British have been stirring up the Indians all over this territory.”  Said Thomas with a mouth full of food.  He wiped his mouth on his sleeve and continued.  “That one you shot was just unlucky that he came alone and picked on you”” – Anthony Mastro, Chapter: Toledo, Page 6

“So John and Thomas joined Hull’s army as trackers.  After a while camp life got dull for John and Thomas.  At first the newness kept them busy but then they got tired of the routine.  Although they made some new friends of the men in the camp by telling stories of the wilderness out west and beyond and of the many animals that there were just waiting for them to hunt, it was still getting tiring.  It all came to an end one day when the order came that the next day they were to march on town called Sandwich in Canada” – Anthony Mastro, Chapter: Sandwich and Toledo Again, Page 11

“The next day Perry’s ship is fired upon by the British and Perry fights back.  John and Thomas are on deck as the two come close to each other.  “Keep your head down.”  Thomas says to John and John ducks behind a barrel holding drinking water they keep on deck.  As the bullets fly back and forth John is proud of the American marines he trained to shoot as they seem to be hitting more targets on the other ship than they themselves are being hit” – Anthony Mastro, Chapter, Page 22


Review

Is This An Overview?

John and Thomas are trappers, who live in a brutal world.  To survive, every moment requires caution and toughness.  This is an era when it was better to group together in communities, for higher chances of survival.  Although John and Thomas have warfare skills, they maintain their humanity.  The story starts with them helping a few people move, as their region is being attacked by American Indians, who have been motivated by the British.  John and Thomas are uncertain about joining any wars, but do join the army as trappers.  Finding motivation to be part of the developing country, to support the efforts against the British.  Even though they prefer land over water, they still join a naval vessel to continue their efforts in defending America. 

 

Caveats?

This is a very short book, with writing style being better or worse in places.  John and Thomas appear to be separate from the rest of society, how others behave, as they represent something more ideal.  There is not much character complexity, or depth.  


Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•What happened in 1812?
•Who are John and Thomas?
•Why did they help people move?
•Why did John and Thomas join the army?
•Why did John and Thomas join a naval vessel? 

Book Details
Publisher:             Anthony Mastro
Edition ISBN:      2940151917049
Pages to read:       21
Publication:          2015
1st Edition:           2015
Format:                 eBook 

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    3
Content          2
Overall          2






Sunday, July 16, 2023

Review of Capitalism: A Short History by Jürgen Kocka

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Book Club Event = Book List (02/24/2024)


Watch Short Review

Excerpts

“With these findings in the history of concepts and theories as a foundation, and after having examined additional proposals for defining the term, I propose a working definition of capitalism that emphasizes decentralization, commodification, and accumulation as basic characteristics.  First, it is essential that individual and collective actors have rights, usually property rights, that enable them to make economic decisions in a relatively autonomous and decentralized way.  Second, markets serve as the main mechanisms of allocation and coordination; commodification permeates capitalism in many ways, including labor.  Third, capital is central, which means utilizing resources for present investment in expectation of future higher gains, accepting credit in addition to savings and earnings as sources of investment funds, dealing with uncertainty and risk, and maintaining profit and accumulation as goals.  Change, growth, and expansion are inscribed” – Jürgen Kocka, Chapter 1: What Does Capitalism Means?, Page 21

“These merchants traded on their own accounts, even if this was usually done in close coordination with the politically powerful, and often, moreover, in close cooperation with other merchants, typically in cross-border networks based on common ties of ethnicity, homeland, or religion.  There was no lack of profit seeking, daring, dynamism, or a willingness to cope with insecurity and competition.” – Jürgen Kocka, Chapter 2: Merchant Capitalism, Page 25

“In the controversies that have surrounded capitalism, state and market are usually regarded as antipodes, and for good reason.  Market action and governmental-political action are indeed beholden to different logics, especially in the democratic era.  Each one has different foundation on which its legitimacy rests: unequally distributed ownership rights on one side, equal citizenship rights on the other.  They follow different procedures: there one of exchange, here a process of debate with the aim of building consensus and deciding by majority.  There money is the most important medium; here, by contrast, it is power.” – Jürgen Kocka, Chapter 4: The Capitalist Era, Page 145


Review

Is This An Overview?

What defines capital and capitalism has changed.  Capital used to mean money in the process of making more money.  Then expanded into any asset that obtains a profit.  Capitalism came into being as a criticism of the class society.  Capitalism has become a set of aspects which are based on decentralized decision making, commodification, and accumulation.  Within capitalism, markets are the form in which people coordinate and distribute resources.  Capitalism uses various means to expand, to make investments that have an opportunity for greater future reward.   The more global a market is, the more sales opportunities there are. 

The philosophers during the Enlightenment era witnesses destructive wars undertaken by governments, which lead them to seek alternative decision making methods.  Enlightenment philosophers provided a defense for market capitalism, as it could be used as a civilizing force.  The state and market may often be seen in opposition to each other, for they rely on different methods and procedures.  But markets and political power cannot be readily separated.  Capitalists have used government influence to shape production.  To protect their assets, even against competition.  The state and market have different functions, but each relies on the other’s function, to function.  Capitalism also has inherent problems, such as business cycles.  Capitalism values individualism, but too much individualism breaks social ties.  Firms under capitalism can behave in inappropriate ways to earn a profit, such as exploit labor.  Firm behavior that gave rise to labor movements. 

 

Caveats?

This book contains a diverse global history on the methods of capitalism.  Although there is a vast range of history, there is very little content on each historic example and explanation.  Most examples serve as proofs of concept rather than build comprehension of the topic.  Readers who already know more details about the examples are in a better position to understand the context of the ideas.

Social values change.  There are various historical state and market features that have become derided because of the change in values.  Although the author sometimes acknowledges that states have used what has become inappropriate methods of production, the author generally highlights capitalisms involvement in the inappropriate methods of production.  The negative consequences of capitalism are provided, but not the same aspects and consequences within state operations.


Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•What is capitalism?  How has the word changed meaning?
•What is capital?  How has the word changed meaning?
•What is merchant capitalism? 
•How did the Enlightenment shape capitalism? 
•What is utopian capitalism? 
•How did industrialization change capitalism? 
•How do markets operate? 
•Is there a need for a state? 
•What are the problems with capitalism?
•What inspired the labor movement? 
•What are business cycles? 
•How did Karl Marks influence capitalism?
•How did Joseph Schumpeter influence capitalism? 

Book Details
Translator:            Jürgen Kocka
Publisher:             Princeton University Press
Edition ISBN:      9780691178226
Pages to read:       171
Publication:          2018
1st Edition:           2013
Format:                 Paperback 

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    5
Content          3
Overall          3






Wednesday, July 12, 2023

Review of The Battle of the Little Bighorn: A Good Day To Die by Francis Hayes

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Genre = History, War


Watch Short Review

Excerpts

“Together as never before, the Lakota resolved to stand against the white man as one people in order to preserve their land and their way of life.  |  This resolve was soon put to the test.  When gold was discovered in the Rocky Mountains in 1859, the floodgates opened as miners of every description poured into the region.  The Lakota reacted by engaging upon a stratagem of hit-and-run tactics that have come to be known as guerrilla warfare.  At the forefront of the attacks was the great military leader and mystic, Sitting Bull.” – Francis Hayes, Chapter One: The Combatants, Page 8

“The Black Hills had great practical as well as spiritual value to the Sioux.  They were referred to by Sitting Bull as the meat pack of the nation due to the abundance of wildlife that occupied them.  This made them a hunter’s paradise.  The sheltered meadows in the region were ideal for campsites, while the ramrod-straight pines were just the thing for fashioning lodgepoles.  |  The Hills were also strategically important as a place to retreat to in times of war.” – Francis Hayes, Chapter Two: Gold in the Black Hills, Page 17

“THE GREATEST VICTORY that the Plains Indians ever experienced over the United States Army also sounded the death knell for the Sioux and Cheyenee.  The massive village had moved into the Bighorn mountains following the battle and spent several days celebrating their victory.  Among the thousands gathered, many thought that the soldiers would not dare to even approach them now that they had flexed their combined muscle.  But older, wiser heads knew otherwise.  Foremost among them was Sitting Bull.  He knew that, far from standing back, the army would now pursue them with renewed vigor – and they wouldn’t stop until the last Indian was either dead or confined to the reservation.” – Francis Hayes, Chapter Eleven: Aftermath, Page 123


Review

Is This An Overview?

During 1876, Americans thought that the Native Americans have been conquered and were no longer a cause for concern.  But then they received reports of a military unit being devastated by the Native Americans.  This event has become known as The Battle of the Little Bighorn.  What culminated into the battle, started with American expansion.  The US government sought the Native American land for various reasons such as to build a transcontinental railway, and the rumored gold on Native American land. 

The US government wanted to make a treaty for the region, to put the Native Americans into reservations where they would be provided for.  Some Native Americans did sign such a treaty.  Those that did not sign the treaty, knew that any treaty with the US government was worthless.  When the US government could not stop their people from entering Native American land, they advised the Native Americans to sell the land.  But the land was not for sale. 

To prevent American expansion, the Native Americans united to preserve their way of life.  The opponents used different strategies, but the Native Americans were underestimated.  The American forces lost.  The Native Americans defended their land, and were victorious, but their victory was temporary.  As the Native Americans were recognized as a threat, the US government made provisions for more forts and military might in the region.  The US government retaliation had over time overcome the Native Americans. 

 

Caveats?

This is short book.  Book might be short, but does express a complex understanding of the people involved.  There are many details provided on the battle, and general events that caused the conflicts.  There is not much detail on the various cultures.  Some events can be harder to understand without the related historical details.  


Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•Why was there conflict between the Native Americans and the Americans?
•What was the outcome of The Battle of the Little Bighorn? 
•How did Americans try to obtain Native American land?
•How did the US government respond to when their people went on Native American land?
•What virtues did the Native American value? 
•Who was Crazy Horse?
•Who was Sitting Bull?
•Who was George Armstrong Custer?
•Who was Ulysses Simpson Grant? 
•What did the Black Hill mean to the Native Americans? 

Book Details
Publisher:             Francis Hayes
Edition ISBN:      2940154906439
Pages to read:       128
Publication:          2017
1st Edition:           2017
Format:                 eBook 

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    4
Content          3
Overall          2






Saturday, July 8, 2023

Review of The Neuroscience of You: How Every Brain Is Different and How to Understand Yours by Chantel Prat

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Genre = Psychology
Book Club Event = Book List (12/16/2023)

Watch Short Review

Excerpts

“Every single life experience changes your brain.  Some of the changes are inconsequential and others are incremental.  But on rare occasions, for better or for worse, a single event can change the way we work, forever.” – Chantel Prat, Introductions, Page 30

“Whether your brain relies on the forest or the trees to figure out what’s going on, the part I find most remarkable about this is that we don’t walk around feeling confused all the time, despite the fact that we’re constantly faced with incomplete or ambiguous information.  The reason for this is that your brain simply fills in the blanks, using different types of information and computations to figure out what’s happening.  And as you’ll learn throughout this book, this creates ample opportunity for different ways of interpreting the same input.  Using its different mechanisms for understand the world, your brain builds a more concrete and complete story than it actually has the data to support.  And I’m not talking only about how your brain interprets the stories it reads.  I’m talking about the stories it creates as it produces your experience of reality.” – Chantel Prat, Chapter 1: Lopsided, Page 66

“One problem with this brain design is that it creates a lot of noise.  And the more chemical messages there are floating around in the background, the more difficult it is for any listening neuron to detect a whispered signal from its neighbor.  Additionally, in a perfect world, each neuron’s chemical message should correspond to some time-locked event in either your outer or inner world.  But if that message isn’t received immediately, it can continue to echo around in your brain.  And as the time increases between when a message is sent and when it’s received, so does the chance that the message is no longer relevant.  As you might imagine, this creates a completely different type of noise.” – Chantel Prat, Chapter 2: Mixology, Page 76

Review

Is This An Overview?

Thinking and behavioral responses are shaped by a mixture of biology and experience, a mixture of nature and nurture.  Influenced by how the brain works, the design of the brain.  Each brain can better handle problems that its more suited for.  Each brain is different, which means that each brain processes information differently.  Leading to different understandings.  Different ways that information is interpreted within the broader context.  Different interpretations of the same information, creates difficulty in trying to understand other people.  Not only do different people respond differently to the same external stimuli, but the same individual can respond differently to the same external stimuli.  It takes a lot of effort to understand other individuals. 

 

How Does The Brain Influence Thinking?

The brain was evolutionary designed to adapt.  To learn and adapt to the changing environment.  The brain reconfigures its operations to do different tasks.  The brain constantly fills in incomplete and ambiguous information.  Different brains, interpret information differently.  Creating different experiences of reality.  The individual is an active creator of reality. 

The brain causes thinking, feeling, and behavior.  Those response were not determined at birth, and are capable of change.   Responses that are a combination of biology and experiences.  Every experience changes the brain.  Sometimes the changes are inconsequential or incremental.  Sometimes a single event changes a person’s life forever. 

There are many neurotransmitters that drive thinking, feeling, and behaving.  The various chemical messages can create a lot of noise.  Each can influence the individual, but their influence depends on the environment, and how other communication systems are working in the brain.

Different parts of the brain work together to understand information.  Brain parts specialize and adept, allowing better performance. 

 

What Is Normal?

As every brain is different, it is very difficult to identify what is considered normal or typical.  One criteria of what is typical, can be described as the frequency a brain feature occurs.  Another criteria is functionality, defined by how the design feature works for a person in an environment.  What matters is what can be done with the brain. 

No individual fits into an average representative.  Failure to understand difference leads to incomplete data and incorrect conclusions about brain design.

 

Caveats?

The book does not provide definite answers.  Rather, the book raises more questions about the ideas.  There are various critiques of how phycological experiments were done before, and how they changed and improved.  Providing various limitations about what is known about the brain.  The purpose of the book is to provide a background to understanding the brain, to provide basic information needed for the reader to understand their own brain. 


Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•What shapes thinking and behavior? 
•Nature or nurture?
•Why is each brain different?
•What is normal or typical? 
•How does information get interpreted?
•How do people react to the same external stimuli? 
•How has the brain evolved? 
•How to think about reality?
•How do experience influence the individual? 
•What are neurotransmitters? 
•Are you left brain or right brain? 
•Do taxi drivers have different brains?
•How informative are the twin studies? 
•How does lopsidedness effect the brain?
•What is the effect of dopamine?
•What is the effect of serotonin? 
•How to develop curiosity? 
•Is mind control real?
•How to focus? 
•How much energy does the brain use? 
•Do people behave the way they think they behave? 
•Can another individual be known?  

Book Details
Publisher:             Dutton [Penguin Random House LLC]
Edition ISBN:      9781524746612
Pages to read:       237
Publication:          2022
1st Edition:           2022
Format:                  eBook 

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    5
Content          5
Overall          5






Tuesday, July 4, 2023

Review of The Heroine With 1,001 Faces by Maria Tatar

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Genre = Sociology


Watch Short Review

Excerpts

“They escape domestic abuse and violence through storytelling.  Rarely wielding the sword and often deprived of the pen, women have relied on the domestic crafts and their verbal analogues – spinning tales, weaving plots, and telling yarns – to make things right, not just getting even but also securing social justice.” – Maria Tatar, Introduction, Page XVIII

“In other words, true heroism is situated not in those striving for glory and immortality but in the fearless women who sought to preserve life – sometimes just to survive – rather than engage in senseless acts of annihilation.” – Maria Tatar, Chapter 1: “Sing, O Muse”, Page 43

“Gossip has value precisely because it creates opportunities for talking through the emotional entanglements of our social lives.  Its participants jointly construct narratives from the stuff of everyday life, spicy plots charged with speculative glee.  Gossip takes up a range of topics, among them scandal, which invites us to engage in talk about moral dilemmas and social conflicts.  And, more important, it serves as a resource for those without access to other options for securing knowledge, operating as a licensed form of release that may not upend the order of things but still serves as an expressive outlet.” – Maria Tatar, Chapter 3: Resistance and Revelation, Page 121


Review

Is This An Overview?

Women go on quests, but use different methods than men to find resolutions.  Using stealth, curiosity, and empathy to seek knowledge and justice.  Rather than wield the sword, they use their voice.  Women strove to preserve life, in ways without violence.  Using their voice to share information, often through storytelling, as a form of therapy and finding meaning.  A voice that holds power of persuasion, to change other people’s behavior. 

 

As the power of women came from using their voice, their voice has often been silenced.  Even silenced, women were able to communicate.  Taking the risk in voicing information.  A valuable communication method was gossip, for gossip creates a network of social interactions beyond an authority’s control.  A way of collecting information, and turning the information into useful knowledge through analysis.  As culture changes, the stories about women also change.  The rare female warrior has become routine.  No longer passive receipts of ire, but active agents of heroic change. 

 

Caveats?

Myths and stories reflect social values.  Either values change, which changes the stories being told to reflect the values, or the stories influence a change in values.  Once acceptable types of story structures, have changed their worth.  In this book, the prior stories are disparaged, even though they reflect different sets of values that were complex and acceptable during the eras.  Simplifying the complexity of the stories into men being brutes who care for little else besides violence, and women who are victims but still want the best for others.  


Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•What kind of heroines are women? 
•What is the role of women?
•What methods do women use when they go on quests?
•What power do women have?
•Why are women silenced? 
•How has to role of women changed? 
•What is true heroism?
•What is the worth for male heroes?
•What is the purpose of gossip?
•What kind of role models do men have? 
•What is the story of Scheherazade?
•What is the story of Cupid and Psyche?
•What does it mean to be curious?  

Book Details
Edition:                 First Edition
Publisher:             Liveright Publishing Corporation [W. W. Norton & Company]
Edition ISBN:      9781631498817
Pages to read:       306
Publication:          2021
1st Edition:           2021
Format:                 Hardcover

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    5
Content          4
Overall          3