Elizabeth has been hospitalized for
a long time, due to a history of seeing the dead. Having a visceral experience with the
dead. The dead guide Elizabeth’s
behaviors. While institutionalized,
Elizabeth is being visited by Ted. Ted
is volunteering to visit Elizabeth. Ted
is in school, on the verge of adulthood.
Elizabeth feels better when Ted visits, while Ted is able to talk to
Elizabeth about relationship advice.
Elizabeth and Ted bond, but Elizabeth’s past intertwines with their
present. How does Elizabeth’s past
effect Ted?
Questions to Consider while Reading the Book
•What is the raison d’etre of the book? For what purpose did the author write the book? Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•Who is Elizabeth?
•Who is Ted?
•What is Elizabeth’s mental status?
•Why does Ted volunteer to visit Elizabeth?
•What does Elizabeth gain from the visits?
•Who is Hester?
•What happened when Elizabeth was not allowed visitors anymore?
Daniel has many mental health problems, some of which have
been inherited from Daniel’s father.
Daniel is bipolar, alternating between mania and depression. Therapists had tried to give Daniel various
medications, which did not work. To get
to know oneself, Daniel makes various tapes which are left with the
therapist.
Before taking a trip to visit a friend, Daniel obtains the
interview tapes, and some therapists notes.
Daniel is a bit afraid to look over the content, while does not want to
be afraid of the information. Then
begins to get to know oneself, with the therapists’ notes providing a grim
conclusion to Daniel’s health. The taped
interviews are of Daniel’s various friends and family members. Who is Daniel interviewing?
Questions to Consider while Reading the Book
•What is the raison d’etre of the book? For what purpose did the author write the book? Why do people read this book?
Samuel is a 12-year-old boy, who believes that Samuel can
foresee someone’s death. The observation
started with Samuel’s teacher, Jevins.
Samuel had a bad feeling about Jevins, who was an elderly fellow. Samuel was imagining the death of Jevins, and
felt uncomfortable with those thoughts.
Shortly after, Jevins passed away.
Samuel becomes emotional about Jevins death, having foreseen it
coming.
Samuel’s mother referenced that Samuel was overcome with
emotions when a grandparent passed.
Samuel’s older brother Trevor references something similar with their
father. Their father had a dream of a
cousin’s death, and the cousin died shortly after. Then Samuel has a dream, of Trevor dying
during a forthcoming trip. The parents
use various methods to tell Samuel that Samuel cannot predict when people die,
to not confuse what is real and what is not real. But Samuel cannot let go of the feeling that
something bad is going to happen to Trevor.
What happens to Trevor?
Questions to Consider while Reading the Book
•What is the raison d’etre of the book? For what purpose did the author write the book? Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•Who is Samuel?
•Who is Mr. Jevins?
•Who is Trevor?
•What happened to William?
•How do Samuel’s parents explain Samuel’s emotions?
James received a letter, which had prompted an immediate
vacation from work. The vacation was a
pretext, as James left work completely.
James’s behavior changed drastically after receiving the letter, for
James did not have long to live. James
initially becomes more involved, experimenting with what life has to
offer. But then becomes reclusive, with
people noticing how James does not appear well.
Since getting the letter, James has been writing letters to James’s
father. Reflecting on one’s life,
without sharing the cause of the letters.
What does James’s father think of the letters?
Questions to Consider while Reading the Book
•What is the raison d’etre of the book? For what purpose did the author write the book? Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•Who is James?
•How is James’s health?
•How does James respond to the letter that was received?
Ellen and Paul are visiting another country. Primarily for Paul’s mental health, but under
the pretext of Ellen’s research. Paul
has become lethargic, depressed, barely able to make decisions for
oneself. The change of scenery was meant
to help. Years have already been spent
on going from doctor to doctor when Ellen finds a better doctor. Paul feels like a burden on Ellen.
While waiting for Ellen, Paul meets McLaggan who is a
grandmother of a dying grandchild, Albert.
Albert liked medieval history.
McLaggan asked if Paul can share stories of the era to Albert. Medieval history was not Paul’s topic of
expertise, but begins to speak. Paul
finds the energy to speak to Albert for a long duration. Paul’s teaching appears to be a form of
therapy. What choice does Paul make when
the trip comes to an end?
Questions to Consider while Reading the Book
•What is the raison d’etre of the book? For what purpose did the author write the book? Why do people read this book?
Owen and Hillary are brother and
sister who are devoted to each other.
Their bond developed due to a loss of a parent when they were
young. Both end up liking Ben, for Ben
can sympathize with their sadness. Ben
also experienced a tragic loss of a parent at a young age. Hillary and Ben were together for a time
until Ben had to move away due to a job.
Coming back into their lives many years later, married with
children. The siblings still care for
Ben, but do not want to get in each other’s way. They are more devoted to each other. How did Ben effect the siblings?
Questions to Consider while Reading the Book
•What is the raison d’etre of the book? For what purpose did the author write the book? Why do people read this book?
A teenage boy has his life unraveled. The death of both parents in quick
succession. Having to move into a home
of strangers. This is a story of how the
boy handles grief, along with one’s gender identity. During a time of stigma against
homosexuality, the boy enjoys school to get closer to another boy. The way the grief ridden boy gets attention
from the boy he wants, is by antagonizing the boy he wants. Antagonism that has a psychical
response. A cycle of self-harm
forms. Why does the grief ridden boy
behave in a self-harming way? What
happens to the boy he wants?
Questions to Consider while Reading the Book
•What is the raison d’etre of the book? For what purpose did the author write the book? Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•To whom would you suggest the book?
•What happened to the teenage boy?
•How does the teenage boy handle the emotional situation?
Frank Briggs is a doctor who is helping a mother handle the
depression after losing a child.
Buckholdt tells the story of how the child died. The story of the toll that drugs took on the
child. How erratic the child’s behavior
had become. As a mother, Buckholdt
wanted to help, but the child made decisions that led to death. To handle the depression, Buckholdt sometimes
takes prescription medication.
Frank knows and can provide the medication needed for
Buckholdt, but wants to help more. Wants
more than the prescriptions, wants to have more regular conversations to help
with the depression. Buckholdt does
improve with the medication, but claims to handle life without them. Frank tries to impose more regular therapy
sessions. Why does Frank want to have
proximity to Buckholdt?
Questions to Consider while Reading the Book
•What is the raison d’etre of the book? For what purpose did the author write the book? Why do people read this book?
This is a story of Franklin Caldwell Singer, who is supposed
to take medication, but does not take the medication. Not wanting to take the medication, to not
become docile. A story of how the mind
shapes how the individual perceives oneself and others. Franklin is a supposed engineer, an
entrepreneur. Uses one’s mind in
creative ways. Seeing opportunities to
improve everyone’s quality of life.
Seeing opportunities has consequences, of not seeing the
consequences.
This story is about Franklin wanting to see Franklin’s
children. With only Graham
responding. But when Franklin arrives,
Franklin becomes distracted by the opportunities for projects. Barely noticing, barely hearing Graham. As Franklin spends time with Graham, Franklin
becomes ever more anxious as Franklin sees that everyone in public is trying to
steal Franklin’s ideas. How can Graham
be heard?
Questions to Consider while Reading the Book
•What is the raison d’etre of the book? For what purpose did the author write the book? Why do people read this book?
There are a variety of mental health problems that someone
can face. States of mind that makes the
person feel isolated, alone, a stranger to everyone around them. No one else can understand what the person is
going through. The person is in a state
of mind that makes it difficult to connect with, makes their thoughts and
behavior strange to others. This is a
book sharing a diverse set of people with various mental health problems. To show that there are others who are going
through mental health problems of their own.
To show that a person can find others, that the person is not a stranger
to these characters. Not a stranger
within these pages.
Caveats?
This is a collection of various
short stories, which have mixed qualities.
Sometimes the short stories can bring an understanding of what other
people are going through, sometimes more details would be advisable. The stories show a variety of ways people
resolve their problems, which are based on real choices, but there are some
resolutions that are not advisable.
Better to seek help, then use the characters methods.
Questions to Consider while Reading the Book
•What is the raison d’etre of the book? For what purpose did the author write the book? Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•Why would a person feel like a stranger?
•Why is a person not a stranger?
•What are the represented mental health problems?
•How do the characters respond to what is happing to them?
•What are the represented resolutions to mental health problems?
“Amma then spent decades on the fringe, a renegade lobbing
hand grenades at the establishment that excluded her | until the mainstream
began to absorb what was once radical and she found herself hopeful and joining
it | which only happened when the first female artistic director assumed the
helm of the National three years ago” – Bernardine Evaristo, Chapter 1: Amma,
Page 13
“Before arriving at Spirit Moon, Dominique had naively
thought of housebuilding in purely romantic terms; she’d imagined her lean,
long, much admired body becoming even more toned, supple and strong through
using it as nature intended – working in the great outdoors, doing strenuous
physical exercise, enjoying camaraderie with her co-workers, getting sweaty and
dusty and looking forward to showering it of at the end of the day before
sitting down to a hearty meal | work would be simple, vigorous and life-enhancing|
well, it didn’t quite work out like that” – Bernardine Evaristo, Chapter1:
Dominique, Page 78
People and society change.
These are stories of diverse characters reacting to the changes of their
life. Stories that can be read
independently, but are tied together as some characters interact with each
other. The same events are perceived by
a different character, who has their own interpretation of what happened. From the perspective of friends, or
family. These stories are about people
who were or are in some ways repressed by society, but gained power.
Some were excluded from opportunities and were active in
fighting for inclusion. Had become
included and established. Some had
relied on their family for support, a family who fought for the opportunities
to give to their successors. The
successors had become success stories but were distant and seemingly lost their
cultural heritage.
There are many ways to be an activist, but activists have
problems of their own. Being an
inclusive activist means having to negotiate with diverse wants. Wants that are difficult to reconcile. Being an activist and appreciating activist
partners, does not mean that the activists work well together. Like any organization, they have to find ways
to work together.
Caveats?
The writing style is different, having no clear end to a
sentence. This can sometimes be poetic,
but the quality is mixed. The stories
can be engaging, or a reader can get lost in what had happened.
Questions to Consider while Reading the Book
•What is the raison d’etre of the book? For what purpose did the author write the book? Why do people read this book?
“Western liberty was not something
marvelously distinct from historical reality, but the initially unintended side
effect of the drive for power. Rulers
competing for power found that the niches of liberty of local communities made
their societies stronger and more prosperous, hence more fit to compete.” –
David Gress, Introduction, Page 2
“The Grand Narrative was both a version of history and a
description of the ideal modern Western identity. In its basic form, the Grand Narrative
followed an axis that spanned five millennia, from ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia
to mid-twentieth-century America. It was
a history of reason, democracy, and economic growth. Its authors assumed that progress was real,
objectively definable, and universally desirable. Being free was better than being enslaved,
being rich was better than being poor, being healthy better than being sick,
being enlightened better than being superstitious, being at peace better than
being at war. Progress meant moving from
subjection, poverty, disease, superstition, and violence to democracy,
prosperity, health, science, and peace both domestic and international.” – David
Gress, Chapter One: The Grand Narrative and Its Fate, Page 40
“In Western history, the drama of power was inseparably tied
to two other fundamental and recurrent themes – empire and universalism. Power was necessary for empire, which was a
constant aspiration of the greatest Old Western rulers, because they believed
that a universal empire was the only order for humankind; just as there was
only one God in heaven, so there should be only one world ruler on earth.” – David
Gress, Chapter Five: Germanic Freedom and the Old Western Synthesis, Page 171
Review
Is This An Overview?
As Western ideas have become dominant, they have also come
under attack. There is a lot to
criticize about the West, but there is also confusion about what the identity
of the West is. Confusion that seeks to
share the negative consequences without reference to the values.
The West’s defining feature is the contrasting evolution of
liberty and power. Liberty came from the
competition of power, as liberty enables societies to be more effective
competitors. The benefits of Western
ideas were thought to be universally desirable, which has totalitarian
features. Universal values that leaders
wanted to apply to everyone, wanted to rule over everyone. In response to the totalitarian imposition,
people sought for liberty. A search for
power lead to liberty, individualism.
But liberty without an appropriate administration, without governance,
lead to totalitarian regimes.
Caveats?
This book uses nonfiction and fiction to explain the Western
identity. Uses history and
mythology. The interpretations have
mixed qualities. Misinterpreting certain
information for a simplified narrative.
Creating an essence of other authors, and the West. Various authors presented have more complex
claims than a single underlying theme provided.
The same narrative of the West, can apply to other societies as well, as
the same aspects exist throughout various societies.
Questions to Consider while Reading the Book
•What is the raison d’etre of the book? For what purpose did the author write the book? Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•What are Western values?
•What are the criticisms of the West?
•What is the Grand Narrative?
•What is the Western identity?
•How did the Greeks effect the West’s identity?
•How did the Roman Empire effect the West’s identity?