Wednesday, March 11, 2026

Review of Nonzero: The Logic of Human Destiny by Robert Wright

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Genre = Sociology
Book Club Event = Book List (03/21/2026)
Intriguing Connections = 1) To Cooperate Or To Defect?, 2) The Strategies Of Game Theory


Watch Short Review

Excerpts

“Still, data are often of little or no cost and great benefit; swapping them is one of the oldest forms of non-zero-sum interaction.  People by their nature come together to constitute a social information processing system and thus reap positive sums.  The fandango, the academic conference, and the Internet are superficially different expressions of the same deep force.” – Robert Wright, Chapter Two: The Way We Were, Page 29



“The impetus gets even stronger when we add one more factor: our old friend from the previous chapter, war.  How would war encourage agriculture?  In primitive war, few things come in handier than sheer manpower.  And agriculture supports much larger settlements than hunting and gathering does.  One of the earliest known farm towns, the ancient, excavated village of Jericho, housed hundreds of people on around six acres.  Not huge by modern urban standards, but compare it to what lies beneath: remnants of a hunter-gatherer camp one-fifth as large.  Imagine a battle between these two villages, and you’ll see that farming was a compelling lifestyle.  Whether or not early farmers thought about the military edge their lifestyle offered, war would have helped the lifestyle spread.” – Robert Wright, Chapter Six: The Inevitability of Agriculture, Page 88

 

“That brings us to the second source of chiefly demise: popular discontent.  One of the great misunderstandings about evolved human nature is that people are sheep; that, because we evolved amid social hierarchy (true), we are designed to slavishly accept low status and blindly follow the leader (false).  People by nature seek the highest status they can attain, under the circumstances, and they accept leadership only so long as it seems to serve their interest.  When it doesn’t, they start to grumble.” – Robert Wright, Chapter Seven: The Age of Chiefdoms, Page 99


Review

Is This An Overview?

Different people are motivated to cooperate, when each benefit from the interaction.  A nonzero sum outcome, a positive sum interaction.  There is more to gain from cooperation than not cooperating.  People can also cooperate to avoid negative sum interactions, in which all who interact lose.  Nonzero interactions can motivate cooperation, but that does not mean that cooperation is without conflict.  The division of benefits and the effort of individuals can be a motivator for conflict.  What creates friction and disables cooperation are zero-sum interactions.  Zero-sum interactions require someone to benefit at the expense of another’s loss.  What someone loses, another gains.

 

Sharing information is a non-zero-sum interaction, for sharing costs little to the sharer but benefits others.  Communities form to share information to enable members to benefit from other people’s information.  Commerce fosters tolerance of other peoples, as the other peoples are or can become customers.  People accept hierarchies, when the hierarchies support the interests of the people.  When leaders exploit the people, the people reject the hierarchies.  War motivates people to come together, for together the people can have a higher chance of defeating the threatening rival than should they fight alone. 

 

Caveats?

This book is based on many examples.  The examples are diverse, and do express the concept of nonzero.  But the concept itself is explained quickly.  The concept is derived from game theory, but no background information in game theory is needed.  This book serves as a validation of the idea.  


Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•What is nonzero sum?
•What are conflicts that arise from cooperation? 
•What is free riding?
•What is social status?
•What is destiny? 
•What are cultures?  
•Is there a cultural hierarchy? 
•What are the tools of racism? 
•Why do hunter-gatherers share food?
•Why share information? 
•How did information technology share society?
•What leads to economic development?  What does not lead to economic development?
•Is war zero-sum or nonzero-sum?
•Why wage peace?
•Why did communities transition to agriculture? 
•Why support a hierarchy?
•How did writing affect societies?  
•What is the effect of barbarians? 
•Why are some ideas more likely to be reborn should they be extinguished?
•What is the effect of competitors?  
•What is the effect of commerce? 

Book Details
Publisher:               Pantheon Books [Random House]
Edition ISBN:         9780375727818
Pages to read:          382
Publication:             2001
1st Edition:              2001
Format:                    eBook 

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    4
Content          3
Overall          3






Wednesday, March 4, 2026

Review of Animal Farm by George Orwell

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Genre = Novel
Book Club Event = Book List (10/03/2026)


Watch Short Review

Excerpts

“”Man is the only creature that consumes without producing.  He does not give milk, he does not lay eggs, he is too weak to pull the plough, he cannot run fast enough to catch rabbits.  Yet he is lord of all the animals.  He sets them to work, he gives back to them the bare minimum that will prevent them from starving, and the rest he keeps for himself.  Our labour tills the soil, our dung fertilizes it, and yet there is not one of us that owns more than his bare skin.”” – George Orwell, Chapter 1, Page 8


“However, these stories were never fully believed.  Rumours of a wonderful farm, where the human beings had been turned out and the animals managed their own affairs, continued to circulate in vague and distorted forms, and throughout that year a wave of rebelliousness ran through the countryside.  Bulls which had always been tractable suddenly turned savage, sheep broke down hedges and devoured the clover, cows kicked the pail over, hunters refused their fences and shot their riders on to the other side.” – George Orwell, Chapter 4, Page 34


“All that year the animals worked like slaves.  But they were happy in their work; they grudged no effort or sacrifice, well aware that everything that they did was for the benefit of themselves and those of their kind who would come after them, and not for a pack of idle, thieving human beings.” – George Orwell, Chapter 6, Page 51


Review

Is This An Overview?

The animals of Manor Farm are the proletariat, the exploited workers.  What keeps them in oppression are humans, who do nothing but take, while ruling over the other animals.  Inspired by a speech of a future without exploitation, a future where animals are free and are equal, the animals prepare themselves for a revolution.  At an opportune moment, without planning, the animals take control of the farm, and turn the farm into Animal Farm.  Laws are distilled into Seven Commandments, that separate humans and other animals, meant to prevent animals from becoming like humans. 

 

Although equals, the pigs are recognized as the thinkers, who can manage Animal Farm.  But the other animals notice that the pigs get extra favors.  All is explained to be to the benefit of the animals, and that the pigs are the ones suffering.  One pig even manages to monopolies power, with other pigs submitting to the pig.  Gradually, the pigs distort the Commandments.  Little by little, the animals lose their rights, lose their freedoms.  Even as they think it’s for their benefit, even as their conditions become worse than under the reign of humans.  What happens to the animals of Animal Farm?

 

Caveats?

Although the setting is in England, the book is about Soviet Russia.  To understand the references, would require background information.  As a theme of the book is about manipulating information, the reader has to trust and mistrust the information provided. 


Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•Who is Mr. Jones?
•What is Manor Farm?
•Who is Old Major?
•What did Old Major’s speech promise?
•What do animals think of humans?
•What is the reference to four and two legs?
•How is the song, ‘Beasts of England’, used?
•What is Squealer capable of?
•What is Animalism? 
•When and how did the Rebellion take place?
•What does clothing represent?
•What is the farmhouse supposed to be used for? 
•What are the Seven Commandments?
•What happens to the Commandents?
•How did the animals think about work after the Rebellion?
•What happened to the milk?
•For what reason do the pigs get more than other animals?
•What is the situation between Pinchfield and Frederick? 
•What did other people and animals think of Animal Farm? 
•Where did the dogs come from? 
•What happened to the pigs who disagreed with Napoleon? 
•What happened to the windmill? 
•What happened to equality? 
•Who is Snowball?
•Who is Napoleon? 
•What happened to Boxer?
•Who is Benjamin? 
•What happed to Mollie? 

Book Details
Edition:                   First Edition
Publisher:               1st World Library
Edition ISBN:         9781595404299
Pages to read:          109
Publication:             2004
1st Edition:              1945
Format:                    Paperback 

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    5
Content          4
Overall          5







Sunday, March 1, 2026

Review of The Trial of Donald H. Rumsfeld by William Cooper

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Genre = Novel
Intriguing Connections = 1) When Intelligence Goes Wrong


Watch Short Review

Excerpts

“The experience taught Rummy a searing lesson he would internalize deeply: showing weakness strengthens one’s opponent.  He’d sharpened this formulation over the years into one of his most frequently uttered sentences: weakness is provocative.” – William Cooper, Chapter 5: September 22, 1975, Page 45


“A few blocks from Cheney’s office, Paul O’Neill was watching alone in his office in his luxurious Washington D.C. apartment.  The room was hazy with smoke from his cigar.  A tall glass of gin rested in his right hand.  Bush had fired O’Neill months earlier, on Cheney’s prodding.  As Cheney said to Rummy after he was canned, O’Neill’s brain only helped if he was on board, if their interests were aligned.  “We don’t want our adversaries to be smart and energetic.  We want them dumb and lazy.”” – William Cooper, Chapter 25: February 5, 2006, Page 132


“Rummy paused.  Again, about half the Republicans stood and clapped.  Everyone else remained seated.  Rummy made a mental note to have Jenkins create a list of all Republicans who weren’t standing during the ovations.  There would be consequences.  The Republicans needed to be unified behind their president or they would get walloped at the polls.  He knew there was disagreement within the party about going into Iran, but these disagreements were for behind closed doors.  He focused on not letting his face show his displeasure.” – William Cooper, Chapter 44: August 26, 2005, Page 180


Review

Is This An Overview?

Intelligence and intention do not necessarily produce quality decisions.  Intelligence and intention can also produce justifications for one’s own ideas, even to contradictory evidence.  This led Donald H. Rumsfeld, known as Rummy, to withhold information that had dire consequences.  Rummy’s often expressed view, is that weakness if provocative.  But the show of strength, creates antagonists.  To overcome a weakness, to cover up for weakness, decisions are made to compensate with a greater show of strength, which further exacerbates the situation. 

 

To defend America, Rummy needed America to go to war.  To justify the war, information was manipulated.  War that cost innocents their lives, while being told that that war is for the good of America.  A war meant to provide stability and democracy to the region attacked.  As opposition mounts, the international community learns that the war need not have happened, and use the International Court to make the case.  Rummy is put on trial.  What is the outcome of the trial?

 

Caveats?

This book uses a mix of real references, real events, real people, but with many fictional details and events.  Meant to make prominent certain political information, that can have dire consequences.  The difficulty is understanding what information is real, and which is fiction.  Some events are clearly identifiable, but others require background information.  The characters are based on real people, who made decisions that are detrimental to the American people, but are not turned into caricatures.


Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•Who is the narrator? 
•Who is Donald H. Rumsfeld (Rummy)?
•Why is Rumsfeld on trial?
•Why did Rumsfeld not inform President Bush of the tape?
•What are the different epistemological categories? 
•How did Joyce effect Rumsfeld? 
•How did Rumsfeld and Nixon interact? 
•For Rumsfeld, why is weakness provocative? 
•What did Rumsfeld do with Searle?
•Why did Rumsfeld want to join Bush? 
•What was the conflict between Rumsfeld and the generals? 
•What did Rumsfeld think of reporters?
•Can there be proof of something that does not exist? 
•What measures does Rumsfeld take to find out if Iraq has WMD?
•What did Rumsfeld think of Clinton?
•What did Rumsfeld do during 9/11?
•What was Bush’s stance on Iraq?
•Why was Iraq chosen as the target? 
•Who is Richard B. Cheney?
•Who is Paul O’Neill?
•What did O’Neill give Suskind?
•What did Rumsfeld learn from Charles Darwin?
•What is catastrophic success?
•What happened in the war against Iraq?
•Who is Condoleezza Rice?
•Why was Rumsfeld interested in Iran? 
•Why did Cheney become President?
•Who Became president after Cheney? 
•How did Rumsfeld treat allies? 
•What happened with Iran? 
•What is the International Criminal Court and what power does it have?
•What did President Trump think of Rumsfeld? 

Book Details
This book was provided to the reviewer by the author
Publisher:               Laughing Nuisance Productions
Edition ISBN:         9798999902900
Pages to read:          281
Publication:             2025
1st Edition:              2025
Format:                    Paperback 

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    5
Content          4
Overall          4







Thursday, February 19, 2026

Review of The God That Failed Edited By Richard H. Crossman

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Genre = Economics
Book Club Event = Book List (02/21/2026)


Watch Short Review

Excerpts

“Gradually I learned to distrust my mechanistic preoccupation with facts and to regard the world around me in the light of dialectic interpretation.  It was a satisfactory and indeed blissful state; once you had assimilated the technique you were no longer disturbed by facts; they automatically took on the proper color and fell into their proper place.  Both morally and logically the Party was infallible: morally, because the aims were right, that is, in accord with the Dialectic of History, and these aims justified all means; logically, because the Party was the vanguard of the Proletariat, and the Proletariat the embodiment of the active principle in History.” – Arthur Koestler, Page 34


“Besides internal differences resulting from its own heterogeneous composition, the Communist International felt the repercussions of every difficulty of the Soviet State.  After Lenin’s death, it was clear that the Soviet State could not avoid what seems to be the destiny of every dictatorship: the gradual and inexorable narrowing of its political pyramid.  The Russian Communist Party, which had suppressed all rival parties and abolished any possibility of general political discussion in the Soviet assemblies, itself suffered a similar fate, and its member’s political views were rapidly ousted by the policy of the Party machine.  From that moment, every difference of opinion in the controlling body was destined to end in the physical extinction of the minority.  The Revolution, which had extinguished its enemies, began to devour its favorite sons.  The thirsty gods gave no more truce.” – Ignazio Silone, Pages 105-106


“Although the long-heralded Dictatorship of the Proletariat has not materialized, there is nevertheless dictatorship of one kind – dictatorship of the Soviet bureaucracy.  It is essential to recognize this and not to allow oneself to be bamboozled.  This is not what was hoped for – one might almost say that it is precisely the last thing in the world that was hoped.  The workers have no longer even the liberty of electing their own representatives to defend their threatened interests.  Free ballot – open or secret – is a derision and a sham; the voters have merely the right of electing those who have been chosen for them beforehand.  The workers are cheated, muzzled and bound hand and foot, so that resistance has become well-nigh impossible.  The game has been well played by Stalin, and Communists the whole world over applaud him, believing that in the Soviet Union at least they have gained a glorious victory, and they call all those who do not agree with them public enemies and traitors.” – AndrĂ© Gide, Pages 184-185


Review

Is This An Overview?

This is a collection of six essays, six individuals, six perspectives on the Russian Communist Party during 1910s to 1940s.  An explanation of how each wanted communism to succeed, but were disillusioned.  Each was drawn into communism for the ideals, and each disillusioned by what happened.  An organized economic system meant to develop society, but had the effect of harming the people claimed to be helped.  These are memoirs of how communism affected the people. 

 

Members of a Communist political party, defer to the party for answers, for decisions.  Facts and morality do not affect decisions made for the party is deemed logically and morally infallible.  The party was at the vanguard of the Proletariat, who were justified by the dialectic interpretation of history.  While ideally, decisions are to be made after a discussion with the members.  In practice, the decisions are delivered from the leaders to everyone else without consultation of anyone else.  Once the party leaders made a decision, any criticism of the decision became a form of sabotage.  After the Communists suppressed all rival political opponents, the members of the Communist Party were also suppressed.  Every difference of opinion became a means of removing the minority. 

 

Building a better future that was without conflict was an idealized goal to the Communist Party, and the people were willing to contribute material and spiritual sacrifices to build that future.  The sacrifice of the individual and freedom for the collective good.  In practice, the sacrifices made the conditions worse than under Imperial Russia.  The Communist Part brought back serfdom and slavery.  The proletariat, the workers, were no longer exploited by Capitalists, but were exploited by the Communists.  Exploited without the ability to resist.  Workers no longer had any ability to elect their own officials.  Effective propaganda kept the conditions of Russia hidden. 

 

Caveats?

The writing style has mixed quality due to the different writing approaches of the authors.  As these are memoirs about the impact of Russian communism, there is a lack of a systematic analysis of socialism. 

 

Although there is diversity in the authors perspectives, and their activities, there are also similarities.  Some praise and criticism of the Russian Communist Party were repetitive.  All 6 are commenting on Russian communism, not generally socialism.  All were commenting on the leadership of the communist party and the effects of the decisions, but none were in leadership positions that made the decisions. 


Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•Why did people support (Russian) communism? 
•What is communism, socialism, and fascism? 
•What did the Bolsheviks do?
•What is a Soviet?
•What happened to Russian collectivization?
•What the did Communist Party think of Spanish fascism?
•What did the Communist Party think of Nazi party?
•What was McCarthyism?
•How did Communism effect and was affected by religion? 
•What is a proletariat? 
•What happens to employment under communism?
•What happens to alternative political party’s?
•What does a Communist Party consider sabotage? 
•How do Communist decisions get made?
•What is the difference between Capitalist and Socialist publishers? 
•What became of ‘intellectuals’?
•Why did Arthur Koestler join the Communist Party?
•What did the Communist party want from Koestler?
•What did the Communist Party think of Koestler’s book?
•How did Russian people treat foreigners? 
•Why did Ignazio Silone join the Communist Party?
•Why can the Italians accept an earthquake? 
•Why did Richard Wright join the Communist Party?
•What did the Communist Party think of race?
•What did Andre Gide think of the Communist Party?
•What are the benefits and consequences of conformity? 
•What did Louis Fischer think of the Communist Party?
•What is ‘Socialist realism’?
•When did the Bolshevik Revolution end? 
•What happens to freedom when property is transferred to government?
•What did Stephen Spender think of the Communist Party?
•What do Communists think about the death? 

Book Details
Forword Author:   David E. Engerman
Ancillary Foreword: Enid Starkie
Contributing Authors: Richard H. Crossman, Arthur Koestler, Ignazio Silone, Richard Wright, AndrĂ© Gide, Louis Fisher, Stephen Spender, 
Publisher:               Columbia University Press
Edition ISBN:         9780231123952
Pages to read:          298
Publication:             2001
1st Edition:              1950
Format:                    Paperback

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    4
Content          5
Overall          4






Thursday, February 12, 2026

Review of Land Between the Rivers: A 5,000-Year History of Iraq by Bartle Bull

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Book Club Event = Book List (04/04/2026)
Intriguing Connections = 1) Get To Know The Peoples Of The World (Abbasid Caliphate


Watch Short Review

Excerpts

“And then, around that time, civilization was born: urban life, based on nutritional surplus and social organization, characterized by complexity and material culture, much of it made possible by writing.  This happened in a very particular part of the world: the flood-prone, drought-wracked, frequently pestilential plain of southern Iraq, where the rivers Tigris and Euphrates meet the Persian Gulf.  The plain could be fertile, very fertile, but only when people worked together to irrigate it and control the floods with channels and earthworks; this necessity, most likely, accounts for much of the early surge in social complexity that distinguished the area.  Later civilizations would arise independently in two great river valleys not so far away, the Indus and the Nile, but the original organized, literate, urban culture was produced by a far crueler and more challenging environment than either of those.” – Bartle Bull, Prologue, Page xxi-xxii 


“It was all based on endless war.  For the Assyrians, what was originally opportunistic brigandage eventually became an engine of self-sustaining necessity.  Facing a ceaseless succession of tough neighbors on all sides, lacking both access to the sea and natural defensive frontiers of their own, constantly provoking those around it with never-ending rapine, the Assyrian state would die if it stopped fighting.” – Bartle Bull, Chapter 3: Babylon and Assyria, Page 43


“In Babylon as elsewhere, Cyrus left administrations in place but established above them a layer reporting directly to himself: satraps, treasurers, and military commanders.  His basic administrative system was to endure until the arrival of Alexander two centuries later.  The Macedonian then retained so much of the administration of the Persian Empire that he Has frequently been called the last of the Achaemenids.” – Bartle Bull, Chapter 4: Persians, Greeks, and Jews, Page 57



Review

Is This An Overview?

Iraq is a Mesopotamian state whose culture influenced and was influenced by world affairs.  Iraq is where Babylon once stood.  Mesopotamia developed social complexity to irrigate and control the floods which provided the region with fertility that precipitated in civilization.  The Sumerians developed governance of the political, legal, and religious variety.  The Assyrians developed methods of war for their state was engaged in an endless war.  The Assyrians were surrounded by powerful neighbors who threatened and were threatened by Assyrians, creating conditions for war as a means of self-sustaining necessity.  The Persian Empire taught the region that that collective membership of the various people was beneficial to each.  Persian administration was used even by Alexander the Great.  The Parthians would influence Roman politics.  Science was developed under the Abbasid Caliphate.  Faisal’s efforts gave Iraq independence after the collapse of the Ottoman Empire.

 

Caveats?

Iraq is appropriately the subtitle, as the majority of the book is about the societies of Mesopotamia.  There are few chapters directly about Iraq, the region that would become Iraq, with various references to Iraq in other chapters.  But much of the book is about societies which controlled or influenced Iraq.  Events which often happened elsewhere in Mesopotamia or Arabia.  The story of the region is told by focusing on specific events, specific individuals which are used as representatives of the era.  A complex history is told, but as with all history, there are limitations to what information is shared about the societies observed.


Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•Where does the name Iraq come from?
•How did Mesopotamia influence the development of civilization? 
•What is the story of Who Gilgamesh? 
•What kind of governance did Sumer have?
•How did Mesopotamia influence religion? 
•Who were the Assyrians?
•Who were the Persians?
•Who are the ‘babblers’?
•Who was Alexander the Great? 
•What was the significance of the Macedonian phalanx?
•Who was Seleucus? 
•Who were the Parthians?
•What led to the development of mounted knights of medieval Europe?
•Who are the magi?
•What led to the schism in Islam?
•What policies were held in Medina?
•What happened to the Islamic State?
•What was the Umayyad Caliphate?
•What was the Abbasid Caliphate?
•What was the Ottoman Empire? 
•How did Iraq come to be? 

Book Details
Edition:                   First Grove Atlantic paperback edition
Publisher:               Grove Press [Grove Atlantic]
Edition ISBN:         9780802165411
Pages to read:          501
Publication:             2025
1st Edition:              2024
Format:                    Paperback 

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    4
Content          4
Overall          4