Sunday, September 27, 2026

Review of Wine and War: The French, the Nazis, and the Battle for France's Greatest Treasure by Don Kladstrup, and Petie Kladstrup

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Genre = History
Intriguing Connections = 1) Get To Know The Peoples Of The World (France, Germany), 


Watch Short Review

Excerpts

“German authorities, however, had made a mistake.  The weinführers were, indeed, wine merchants and wine experts, but they were much more than that.  They also were friends of many French wine producers and merchants.  Their connection through generations of doing business together had long since transcended commercial matters; they had trained in each other’s firms and spoke each other’s language fluently.  They were even godfathers to each other’s children.” – Don Kladstrup, and Petie Kladstrup, Chapter 3: The Weinführers, Page 60

 

“In fact, the Resistance was doing a great deal more.  It had picked up on the fact that champagne shipments were providing significant military intelligence.  Through them, they could tell where the Germans were preparing a major military offensive.  They first became aware of this when the Germans, in 1940, ordered tens of thousands of bottles to be sent to Romania, where, officially, there was only a small German mission.  Within a few days, Romania was invaded by the German army.  Afterward, bottles of bubbly were distributed to all the troops, a way of saying to the soldiers that “the Führer thinks of his men first.”” – Don Kladstrup, and Petie Kladstrup, Chapter 3: The Weinführers, Pages 85-86

 

“It was a plight facing nearly every winegrower, and the problems extended to their cellars as well.  Wines that had lain in wooden casks for five years desperately needed bottling, but that was impossible because there was a bottle shortage.  For many wines, it was already too late.  They had dried out, lost their fruit and were undrinkable.  The casks in which they had been aging were ruined as well.  Some had become moldy from overuse, while others were damaged when overzealous Vichy inspectors poured oil into them to prevent vignerons from withholding their industrial alcohol quota.” – Don Kladstrup, and Petie Kladstrup, Chapter 11: I Came Home Not Young Anymore, Page 226


Review

Is This An Overview?

For France, wine is more than a commercial product.  Wine is part of French cultural heritage.  Wine kept people’s morale up even during the harshest of times.  As war loomed, winegrowers were granted a delay in being called to active duty.  Equipment was not requisitioned until the harvest was complete. 

 

France was plundered after France surrendered to Germany.  Wines were looted.  Germany wanted to prevent the looting, as the looting hurt requisitions for military purposes.  To prevent wine plundering, and to direct wine production, Germany created the weinführers.  Weinführers were wine merchants in uniform.  What Germany’s leadership did not know, was that the weinführers had connections with the French wine producers and merchants.  Connections beyond the commercial.  Wine producers and merchants trained together, and had familial relations.

 

French wine merchants were forced to sell wine only to Germany, at terrible prices.  But the weinführers did what was possible to enable wine producers to continue business as normal.  Weinführers tried to keep balance between the French and Germans, by not making each too angry.  Weinführers tried to make sure that the wine merchants had the necessary supplies, even during a time of shortages.  Weinführers allowed poor-quality wine to be sold to Germany.  Poor-quality wine that would have otherwise been unsold on the regular market. 

 

Even with weinführers trying to keep production going, there was a drastic reduction in wine production.   There was a shortage of labor, horses, chemicals, and other resources that prevented production.  Some producers could not get wine to the market because Germans seized the available trucks.  Producers that had trucks, could not use the trucks due to gasoline rations.  Part of wine production was to be requisitioned for industrial alcohol.  To get the industrial alcohol, officials poured heating oil into barrels to adulterate the wine, which prevented the wine from consumption.

 

Wine was part of the Resistance movement.  To protect valuable wine, wine was hidden behind fake walls and by other means.  French restaurants sold wine spiked with carpet dust to Germans, to make the wine appear old and rare.  Wine shipments provided military intelligence to the Resistance, as the location and amount of ordered wine indicated German troop movements.  Wine producers helped Resistance members travel between locations, in wine barrels. 

 

Caveats?

As the authors note, this is not a book about wine or war.  There is limited information on wine production and details of the war.  This book is about how wine affected the war effort.  


Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•What happened in Berchtesgaden? 
•What affect does wine have on troops? 
•What is needed for wine production?
•What is the purpose of copper sulfate in wine production?
•How does sugar affect wine?
•When to harvest grapes? 
•How did war affect wine production?
•How was the harvest after WW1?
•What was the purpose of Appellation d’Origine Contrôle>?
•How did advertising affect wine culture? 
•What is the Comité Interprofessionel du Vin de Champagne (CIVC)?
•Why were shipments of wine considered a state secret? 
•Why did the French lose to Germany during WW2?
•Why did France surrender? 
•What did Marshal Pétain think of Germans?
•What did Hitler think of France? 
•What happened to France wineries after German occupation?
•What was the attempt to stop the looting? 
•What power did the Vichy administration have? 
•Was Hitler an ascetic? 
•Who were the weinführers?
•How did the weinführers affect wine production?
•How was wine hidden?
•What did the weinführers think of the quality of wine?
•What happened to wine shipments sent to Germany? 
•How was a carpet company involved in wine production?
•How did the French prevent their property from being requisitioned by the Germans?
•Who did Germans request to prevent sabotage? 
•How much did the French have to eat?
•How much wine was produced during the war?
•How did the industrial alcohol requisition affect wine production? 
•How did labor requisitioned change?
•Did people escape? 
•What was requested happen to Paris rather than surrender Paris to the enemy?
•What happened at the collaboration trials?

Book Details
Historical Consultant:   J. Kim Munholland
Edition:                   First Broadway Books trade paperback edition
Publisher:               Broadway Books [Random House]
Edition ISBN:         9780767904483
Pages to read:          248
Publication:             2002
1st Edition:              2001
Format:                    Paperback 

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    5
Content          5
Overall          5






Wednesday, September 23, 2026

Review of One Day, Everyone Will Have Always Been Against This by Omar El Akkad

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Book Club Event = Book List (11/21/2026)
Intriguing Connections = 1) Biographies: Auto, Memoir, and Other Types, 


Watch Short Review


Excerpts

“One of the hallmarks of Western liberalism is an assumption, in hindsight, of virtuous resistance as the only polite expectation of people on the receiving end of colonialism.  While the terrible thing is happening – while the land is still being stolen and the natives still being killed – any form of opposition is terroristic and must be crushed for the sake of civilization.  But decades, centuries later, when enough of the land has been stolen and enough of the natives killed, it is safe enough to venerate resistance in hindsight.” – Omar El Akkad, Chapter 1: Departure, Page 19-20


“There’s always been a contradiction at the heart of this enterprise.  In the modern, well-dressed definition, adhered to in one form or another at almost every major newspaper, the journalist cannot be an activist, must remain allegiant to a self-erasing neutrality.  Yet journalism at its core is one of the most activist endeavors there is.  A reporter is supposed to agitate against power, against privilege.  Against the slimy wall of press releases and PR nothing-speak that has come to protect every major business and government boardroom ever since Watergate.  A reporter is supposed to agitate against silence.” – Omar El Akkad, Chapter 2: Witness, Page 37


“How long a society can function under such a journalistic model before deteriorating into something unsalvageable is an open question.  But the entire notion of reporter as referee/announcer/scorekeeper, even if it has any merit, requires the game on the field to be played in accordance with some set of rules.  It has no capacity to deal with players who kneecap their opponents in the locker room, who have no interest in the rules or even the game itself.  Listing one position and then the other and letting the reader make up their own mind fails entirely in the face of plain bad faith.” – Omar El Akkad, Chapter Two: Witness, Page 39


Review

Is This An Overview?

To defend civilization, atrocious crimes are committed.  Crimes of the uncivilized sort.  As most people within a society are not bloodthirsty, most people need special language to be used to prevent them from becoming upset about the atrocities committed for their benefit.  To protect people’s emotions, living has become the aberration.  The bloodthirsty do not need such language.  Acts that create condition of having to choose leaders and groups based on the lowest benchmark, of whom is less monstrous than the other monsters.

 

While land is being stolen and people are being killed, any form of opposition becomes an act of terrorism.  Those resisting atrocities need to be crushed for civilization to survive.  After the terrible events have happened, the prior resistance becomes virtuous.  The resistance becomes venerated in hindsight. 

 

As all adults of the opposition become perceived as responsible for the resistance, dead children become a method of justifying resistance.  After a genocide, there is no controversy of calling a genocide by what genocide is, a genocide.  But during the genocide, there is controversy as the resistance becomes considered terrorists who cannot be politically defended.  After the killings, people will try to forget what happened as a form of psychological self-defense. 

 

Journalists are caught in conflict of interest.  Newspapers want neutral journalists, but journalism is an active endeavor to agitate power.  To agitate against silence.  The incentives involved in presenting information, prevents providing readers with different positions to make up their own mind.  Journalists need to make an income, and therefor focus on what incites rage and fear as that draws attention of readers to buy products from the advertisements provided in the newspapers.  Journalists cannot protect laws, when various opponents of journalism do not care for rules or violence against journalist. 

 

Caveats?

This is a memoir, primarily about journalism.  Meant more as a means to vent the frustration of being an activist against various violence acts and the culture of violence.  Not meant to provide comprehensive information on the various topics referenced.  


Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•What was the author’s book club experience?  
•What about a bomb kills?
•What is needed to prevent barbarism?
•What is the purpose of language? 
•Who does the author represent? 
•What happened in Egypt during the 1980s?
•Why did the author’s father leave Egypt?
•How is resistance perceived?
•What did the Israel govern do circa 2023?
•Why are children referenced during killings?
•Who should assimilate? 
•What training do journalists receive when going to an unstable region?
•What working conditions and incentives do journalists receive? 
•Are journalists neutral?
•What is the difference between how journalists are perceived when persecuted by Russia and Israel?
•Are journalists referee/announcer/scorekeeper?
•By what benchmark should politicians be judged by?
•What is Guantanamo Bay military courtroom?
•What is the author’s stand on violence?  From whom and by whom?

Book Details
Publisher:               Alfred A. Knopf [Penguin Random House]
Edition ISBN:         9780593804155
Pages to read:          140
Publication:             2025
1st Edition:              2025
Format:                    eBook 

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    5
Content          2
Overall          2






Saturday, September 19, 2026

Review of Law, Justice, and Power: Between Reason and Will edited by Sinkwan Cheng

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Genre = Law


Watch Short Review

Excerpts

“According to David Hume and J. S. Mill, questions of justice arise in conjunction with conflicts of interest.  Had it not been for the limits to human benevolence and the competition for scarce goods, justice would not have been an issue.  Justice impacts on our consciousness most concretely when people press claims and justify them by refence to a set of rules.” – Sinkwan Cheng, Introduction, Page 1


“The intricate relationship between law and justice becomes infinitely more complex when power is brought on stage.  A consideration of power is indispensable because, whatever ideas we have about law and justice, it is power that makes a real difference in the world – be it catastrophic or providential.  Power, in other words, reveals both the oppressive and benevolent faces of the law.  Only through power can law act as an oppressive apparatus.” – Sinkwan Cheng, Introduction, Page 3


“For law to rule, it has to be comprehensive in its potential range.  It has to be able to do anything, if not everything.  It cannot, then, simply secure stability and predictability but also has to do the opposite: it has to ensure that law is ever responsive to change; otherwise, law will eventually cease to rule the situation that has changed around it.  So how could the rule of law be complete if it must ever respond to the infinite variety of fact and circumstance impinging on it?  How could it be closed when it must hold itself constantly responsive to all that is beyond what it may at any moment be?” – Peter Fitzpatrick, Chapter 10: Law in the Domains of Death, Page 210


Review

Is This An Overview?

Justice is needed to resolve conflicts of interest.  With the competition for scarce resources, justice provides a method of managing expectations through agreed upon rules.  But rules need to be enforced, which requires power.  Power determines whether the law becomes oppressive or benevolent.  Justice needs force, but force without justice is tyrannical.  Having power, does not mean that those who wield power, can do all that is possible with the power.  Those who have power have overridden laws and justice by claiming a moral duty to their actions. 

 

Laws provide stability and predictability, but also change.  To retain the rule of law, laws need to constantly respond and adapt to changes around laws.  But there are infinite variations of facts and circumstances that prevent laws from becoming a complete guide to justice.

 

Caveats?

This book is a composition of various authors.  Although each author has their own writing style, the book is generally difficult to read.  The authors use abstract language, that requires a background in law and philosophy to decipher appropriately. 

 

The authors often use very short examples as evidence of a claim, but those examples are not given much context.  Making the example liable to different interpretations based on missing details.  The reader is expected to know a diverse set of examples throughout history.


Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•Why is there a need for justice? 
•What is the effect of power?
•What are the limits of power? 
•How are laws enforced?
•How does moral duty affect laws?
•How did NATO affect Kosova? 
•What is sovereign speech?
•How does ethics affect laws?
•Can laws be complete?

Book Details
Chapter Authors:   Alain Badiou, John Brigham, Sinkwan Cheng, Peter Fenves, Peter Fitzpatrick, Nancy Fraser, Robert Gibbs, Martti Koskenniemi, Julia Kristeva, Ernesto Laclau, Juliet Flower MacCannell, J. Hillis Miller, Maggie O'Neill, Slavoj Žižek
Publisher:               Stanford University Press
Edition ISBN:         9780804748919
Pages to read:          269
Publication:             2004
1st Edition:              2004
Format:                    Paperback 

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    1
Content          2
Overall          1






Tuesday, September 15, 2026

Review of Beyond the Idea: How to Execute Innovation in Any Organization by Vijay Govindarajan, and Chris Trimble

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Book Club Event = Book List (11/07/2026)



Watch Short Review

Excerpts

“The challenge is not just to make innovation happen, but to do so while simultaneously excelling at ongoing operations.  The challenge is to tackle two very different activities – in fact, two diametrically opposed activities – at the same time.” – Vijay Govindarajan, and Chris Trimble, Chapter 1: The Other Side of Innovation, Page 16


“As important as it is to take the step of commissioning a Dedicated Team, it is not enough to do so.  The Special Team is not one group of people, it is two groups.  It is a partnership between the Dedicated Team and the Shared Staff.  As its name implies, the Shared Staff does double duty.  It takes on selected innovation tasks while simultaneously sustaining excellence in day-to-day operations.” – Vijay Govindarajan, and Chris Trimble, Chapter 5: Build the Team: An Overview, Page 43


“Bringing about a dramatic change in work relationships, even in groups of just two people, is hard work.  Now imagine trying to do so while simultaneously sustaining excellence in the work you already do.  It’s nearly impossible.  Every day, the existing work reinforces the relationship that’s already in place.” – Vijay Govindarajan, and Chris Trimble, Chapter 6: Divide the Labor, Page 48


Review

Is This An Overview?

Innovation takes more than the idea.  Innovation takes both the idea and execution of the idea.  There is no innovation without committing to developing the idea and putting in the effort to make the idea real.  Companies can lack innovation because companies are built for ongoing operations.  Companies excel at present customers and difficulties.  Innovation takes resources away from ongoing operation, away from pressing concerns, towards experimentation that can fail.  Taking resources away from ongoing operations can threaten the efficiency of ongoing operations.  Companies become efficient as ongoing operations become repeatable and predictable.  But innovation is not routine and contains uncertainty.  The challenge is for companies is to innovate while excelling at ongoing operations. 

 

There are three types of methods, three types of models for executing innovation initiatives.  Each type has different resources constraints.  Model S is for Small initiatives.  Small initiatives are part of a culture of innovation.  Where any employee can develop an idea and take the initiative.  Meant as a strategy for picking up slack within operations.  The limitation of this model is that people are already busy.  Even if many ideas are thought of, there might not be enough resources available to try all the recommended innovations.

 

Model R is for Repeatable initiatives.  This is the method when procedures can be developed for similar innovations.  Procedures that can become repeatable and predictable.  The routine process enables efficient operations.  The limitation of this model is that the more efficient the model is, the less flexible the operations become.  What Model R does is provide a process of updating previous versions of the same product, not developing new products.

 

Model C is for Custom initiatives.  This method takes more effort and creates incompatibilities between innovation and ongoing operations.  This method requires taking work away from ongoing operations, and putting the work into innovation work.  This strategy requires a dedicated team which is dedicated to the innovative product.  And a shared staff that supports the dedicated team while sustaining regular operations.  The limitation of this model is that there will be conflict between what the dedicated team needs and the rest of the company.  The dedicated team needs their own separate cultural norms, to think and behave differently than the rest of the company.  The dedicated team’s efforts are meant to create change, but when the change is too drastic, the change becomes disruptive to ongoing operations.

 

Caveats?

This book is not meant to be comprehensive.  This book is meant for brevity, to be accessible to people who do not have time to read.  Which limits content on the topics covered, with more explanations available in different books.

 

This book often provides basic information, such as about science.  This book can guide inexperienced managers to develop an innovative company, to provide expectations on consequences of making changes and how to avoid certain common problems.  Experienced managers should already have an understanding of how to manage people and products within their company, but can use the book as a reference to where they can improve.  


Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•Is there a difference between innovation and execution?
•What is innovation execution? 
•What is innovation?
•Which part of innovation has intrinsic motivation?
•What is the Performance Engine?
•Why does innovation have difficulty getting company resources? 
•How to innovate while excelling at ongoing operations? 
•What are the models for executing innovation initiatives?
•What is Model S?
•What is the culture of innovation?
•What are limits of Model S?
•What is Model R?
•What are the limits to Model R?
•What is Model C?
•What is the Anti-Lake Wobegon Effect? 
•Which companies can innovate?
•What is a Dedicated Team?
•What is a Shared Staff?
•What is a Little Performance Engine?
•How much to change? 
•What are sources of conflict within Model C?
•What are the limits to spreadsheets?

Book Details
Publisher:               St. Martin's Press [MacMillan Publishers]
Edition ISBN:         9781466835412
Pages to read:          93
Publication:             2013
1st Edition:              2013
Format:                    eBook 

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    5
Content          3
Overall          3






Friday, September 11, 2026

Review of The Dispensable Nation: American Foreign Policy in Retreat by Vali Nasr

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Genre = Politics



Watch Short Review

Excerpts

“In the cocoon of our public debate Obama gets high marks on foreign policy.  That is because his policies’ principal aim is not to make strategic decisions but to satisfy public opinion – he has done more of the things that people want and fewer of the things we have to do that may be unpopular.  To our allies, however, our constant tactical maneuvers don’t add up to a coherent strategy or a vision of global leadership.  Gone is the exuberant American desire to lead in the world.  In its place there is the image of a superpower tired of the world where it has been most intensely engaged.  That impression serves neither America’s long-run interests nor stability around the world.” – Vali Nasr, Prologue: “A Week In September”, Page 12


“In the months that followed, Washington’s pressure-only policy threw relations into a downward spiral that put us at great risk.  America quickly learned that Pakistan could be even less cooperative, and to our surprise, we could not live with that.  A policy of worsening relations to improve them – getting more out of Pakistan by given less – was a nonstarter.  Pakistan did not reward coercion with cooperation.” – Vali Nasr, Chapter 3: Who Lost Pakistan?, Page 86


“The problem with sanctions is that they are just too convenient.  They are what you do when you cannot or will not do anything else.  They offer a good feeling that a crisis is being handled, but in reality they are blunt instruments with a questionable track record.  When they work, they hurt the economy and state institutions of the country they target – along with its civilian populace – but do they reshape the bad policy behaviors that cause them to be applied in the first place?” – Vali Nasr, Chapter 4: Iran: Between War and Containment, Page 110


Review

Is This An Overview?

Effective foreign policy seeks to make ties and gain cooperative decisions from foreign states.  Alliances between states depend on long term policies, that obtain the respect of allies and their supporters.  The military has a role in foreign policy, as a diplomatic tool meant to resolve certain problems and to enable sovereignty.  During President Barack Obama’s administration, rather than the military being an instrument of diplomacy, diplomats were used to support the military.  The administration relied on military agencies for decision making, and choosing military solutions.  The problem is that military solutions are a temporary measure to resolve a conflict, not a method for long term conflict resolution. 

 

With the military in charge, military solutions were presented.  The administration had staff that prevented Obama from being aware of alternative opinions or ideas, a form of strategic ignorance.  The military solutions generally involved coercion.  As foreign states did not appreciate being coerced, foreign states reacted by limiting cooperation.  As military action needed information or permission from foreign states, military actions became more difficult as coerced stated were not willing to provide information or permission.  Rather than find methods for cooperation, American military was willing to disregard the sovereign territory of uncooperative states.  Military action created anti-American sentiments, which made cooperation and long term solutions more difficult.   

 

The focus of Obama’s foreign policy was how decisions would affect media coverage and how domestic political opposition would react.  Foreign policy decisions were to satisfy public opinion, rather than develop appropriate and strategic policies.  Obama did receive praise for foreign policy initiatives, but the praise was not about foreign policy accomplishments or the effect of policies on regions.  The international community’s reaction to Obama’s foreign policy, were violent anti-American protests.  Without long term strategic plans, without diplomacy, America’s international influence is declining.  As America’s international influence declines, foreign states are gaining influence that threatens American security.   

 

Caveats?

There is a political bias in the book.  While sharing the wrong methods that President Barack Obama used to handle foreign affairs, favored Hillary Clinton’s approach to foreign affairs.  As the author favored the diplomatic approach, the information presented validated the diplomatic approach while limiting information on the military approach.   


Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•What is the difference in approaches that Barack Obama wanted as a candidate for President, and the approaches taken when Obama became president?
•What was Obama’s approaches to foreign policy?
•What were Hilliar Clinton’s approaches to foreign policy?
•Who is Richard Holbrooke?
•What were Richard Holbrooke’s approaches to foreign policy?
•How did the news affect foreign policy?
•What was Obama’s decision making process with the NSC? 
•How did Obama’s staff support Obama’s decision making?
•When would military action be appropriate? 
•What is the effect of sanctions? 
•What is the effect of investing in dictatorships?  
•What do Americans think of the Middle East leaders?
•Why is America providing interventions in the Middle East? 
•What was the foreign policy toward Afghanistan?
•What did foreign leaders think was the plan for Afghanistan?  
•Why was Afghanistan the ‘good war’?
•What is al-Qaeda?
•What is the Taliban?
•What was the foreign policy toward Pakistan?
•What is Pakistan’s view of the Taliban?
•What was America’s drone program in Pakistan?
•What was the foreign policy toward Egypt?
•What was the foreign policy toward Iran?
•Does Iran want nuclear weapons?
•What was the foreign policy toward Iraq?
•What is China’s foreign policy?

Book Details
Publisher:               Doubleday [Random House]
Edition ISBN:         9780385536479
Pages to read:          256
Publication:             2013
1st Edition:              2013
Format:                    Hardcover 

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    5
Content          5
Overall          5