Monday, August 3, 2026

Review of A Savage War of Peace: Algeria 1954-1962 by Alistair Horne

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Genre = History, War
Book Club Event = Book List (09/19/2026)
Intriguing Connections = 1) Get To Know The Peoples Of The World (Algeria, France), 


Watch Short Review

Excerpts

“There was an important additional anomaly that provoked bitterness whenever the bona fides of “assimilation” with the mother country were questioned.  This was the issue of French citizenship.  Muslims were automatically French “subjects”, but not French “citizens”.  From the early days legislation had permitted them to be subject to Islamic, as opposed to French, law; this may have been designed as a cultural and religious protection, but it became in effect a prison, because a Muslim wishing to adopt French citizenship had to renounce these rights, thereby virtually committing an act of apostasy.  Moreover, in practice many obstacles were placed in the path of the Muslim seeking French citizenship.” – Alistair Horne, Chapter 1: “A Town of no Great Interest”, Pages 50-51


“And so France in Algeria staggered from war into peace, her prestige in Algeria gravely tainted, her power and influence in the world sorely reduced.  United in despair, the Algerian nationalists saw, in the ending of the war, prospects of a return to “colonialism as usual”, a powerful French army returning to police the country and aid the pieds noirs prevent implementation of the reforms they so ardently demanded.” – Alistair Horne, Chapter 1: “A Town of no Great Interest”, Page 61

 

“At best he would be treated with paternalism, fairness and a kind of formal acceptance of his different religion and culture.  But too often he was regarded with disdain, and from a vantage of superiority; which manifested itself in many different ways, and more insidiously among the poorer levels of whites where the frictional contact was closest.” – Alistair Horne, Chapter 2: “Ici, c’est la France”, Page 77


Review

Is This An Overview?

Before the French conquered Algeria, the state was a collection of literate villages that were nominally administrated by Turkish military.  A territory that was difficult to establish a state identity, and suffered from political internal instability, that reduced their ability to defend against exterior threats.  When France colonized Algeria, the settlers expropriated the land for administrative purposes, taking land without concern for property ownership. 

 

During French occupation of Algeria, the French did develop Algerian infrastructure and social services.  But that was not enough.  The French did not have sufficient administration support for the region, there were economic problems, and a lack of agriculture support.  The Algerians were treated with indifference, tolerated when Algerian labor provided for the exploitation of Algeria.  At times treated with paternalism.  Most of the time, treated with a supremacist disdain.  The French had various views as to why they were in Algeria, which included defending civilization from a Soviet threat. 

 

Assimilation of Muslims to become French citizens were limited, as the requirements were prohibitive, while prevented by officials when assimilation was attempted.  As assimilation became unfeasible, leaders turned to autonomy for Algeria.  Although France was weakened due to World War II, the Algerian nationalists thought that the end of the war had the potential to return Algeria to colonialism as usual.  The return of the French army could be used to police Algeria.  The revolution was a war of peace, as there was no declaration of hostilities.  The revolution was an expression of collective suffering, a reaction to the collective anonymity.  Wanted sovereignty, but with limited bloodshed.  The war did have bloodshed, and was criticized for the torture and bombings.   

 

Caveats?

This book focuses on the details of the war.  Following the progress of the war.  From who did what and where.  To the gruesome engagements, and recrimination.  There is some general information provided about Algeria before and after the war, but not enough for readers who want a broad history of Algeria.  The organization of the details can make the book difficult to read. 


Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•What was the Algerian Revolution?
•What happened to Algeria after the Revolution?
•Why was the Revolution a war of peace?
•Why were the French in Algeria?  
•How did the Algerian Revolution affect French politics?  
•What are the sources for what happened during the Algerian Revolution?  
•What were the collective conditions of Algerians? 
•How does Arab tradition think of history? 
•What was the situation in Algeria during the 1830s?
•Why did France conquer Algeria? 
•What happened to Algerian property when the French conquered Algeria? 
•Where Algerians able to become French citizens? 
•What kind of education did the French want Algerians to have?
•How did World War II affect Algeria and France? 
•What is the geography of Algeria? 
•How were Algerians treated by the French? 
•How did French affect Algerian infrastructure?  
•What kind of conflict did the Algerians want?  
•What king of conflict did the Algerians get?
•What was the outcome of torture?
•What were the details of the war?
•What happened to Algeria after the war?
•How did Algerian immigrant workers in France affect Algeria after the war? 
•What happened to Algerian international approach after the war?

Book Details
Publisher:               New York Review Book [The New York Review of Books]
Edition ISBN:         9781590174814
Pages to read:          721
Publication:             2006
1st Edition:              1977
Format:                    eBook 

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    3
Content          2
Overall          2






Sunday, July 26, 2026

Review of The Death of Expertise: The Campaign against Established Knowledge and Why it Matters by Tom Nichols

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Book Club Event = Book List (09/12/2026)


Watch Short Review

Excerpts

“No, the bigger problem is that we’re proud of not knowing things.  Americans have reached a point where ignorance, especially of anything related to public policy, is an actual virtue.  To reject the advice of experts is to assert autonomy, a way for Americans to insulate their increasingly fragile egos from ever being told they’re wrong about anything.  It is a new Declaration of Independence: no longer do we hold these truths to be self-evident, we hold all truths to be self-evident, even the ones that aren’t true.  All things are knowable and every opinion on any subject is as good as any other.” – Tom Nichols, Preface to the 2017 Edition, Page 15


“These are dangerous times.  Never have so many people had so much access to so much knowledge and yet have been so resistant to learning anything.  In the United States and other developed nations, otherwise intelligent people denigrate intellectual achievement and reject the advice of experts.  Not only do increasing numbers of laypeople lack basic knowledge, they reject fundamental rules of evidence and refuse to learn how to make a logical argument.  In doing so, they risk throwing away centuries of accumulated knowledge and undermining the practices and habits that allow us to develop new knowledge.” – Tom Nichols, Introduction: The Death of Expertise, Page 22


“The deeper issue here is that the Internet is changing the way we read, the way we reason, even the way we think, and all for the worse.  We expect information instantly.  We want it broken down, presented in a way that is pleasing to our eye – no more of those small-type, fragile textbooks, thank you – and we want it to say what we want it to say.  People do not do “research” so much as they “search for pretty pages online to provide answers they like with the least amount of effort and in the shortest time.”  The resulting flood of information, always of varying quality and sometimes of uncertain sanity, creates a veneer of knowledge that leaves people worse off than if they knew nothing at all.” – Tom Nichols, Chapter 4: Let Me Google That for You, Page 119


Review

Is This An Overview?

Within a society, people do not need to know about everything, as division of labor in knowledge allows people to rely on the knowledge of others.  American culture no longer supports the division of labor in knowledge, by not wanting to improve their knowledge, by not relying on experts.  The death of expertise is the disconnect between experts and the communities experts are meant to support.  A lack of dialogue between experts and everyone else.  The death of expertise is not about expert skills, as specialists are still wanted for technical support.  The death of expertise is about the hostility to knowledge.  

 

Although people have access to vast amounts of knowledge, there is a trend in American culture to reject learning anything that contradicts held beliefs.  Rejecting disagreeing information to protect one’s ego.  A deliberate attempt to not know appropriate information.  Rejecting expert advice is perceived as a method of asserting autonomy.  Through the way the internet is used, and being treated as a client of a college rather than a student, people have become to believe that they are experts on everything.  Developing a confusion between knowing some facts and understanding the subject.  Preventing people from understanding when they are wrong, an inability to reevaluate and error correct their views. 

 

What Are Experts?

Excerpts know considerably more on a subject, but that does not mean they know all there is to know about the subject.  Given limited time, gaining expertise in a subject means an inability to learn other subjects.  Requiring experts to rely on other experts in different communities.  Experts stay engaged with their subject matter.

 

Experts can be wrong on occasion, but that is not the same as always being wrong on everything.  Experts are more likely to be right than the public.  Even bad experts, are better than non-experts.  Have relatively more skills.  Competition within fields adjusts who survives. 

 

Experts have contributed to the death of expertise, as various experts have disengaged with the public.  Experts seem to only want to interact with other experts.

 

What Is The Role Of College?

Education is no longer the purpose of a college.  College has become a client-centered experience, which accommodates adolescents rather than overcoming adolescence.  Colleges have surrendered their intellectual authority to activists who attack free inquiry.  Returning society to a state of intolerance, dogmatism, threats and violence.  Rather than supporting critical thinking, college has become a space for safe spaces.  College graduate lack the ability to has a reasoned debate and discussion.

 

There is no interest in stopping grade inflation.  Administrators want high graduation rates.  Departments want to attract students.  Faculty get rewarded when using lower grading standards.  Faculty members focus on student satisfaction and enrollment. 

 

How Does The Internet Effect Expertise? 

While the internet can be a useful tool for those already trained in doing research, the internet allows non experts to pretend to do research.  Research requires the ability to find authentic information, and be able to analyze it. 

 

People use the internet to confirm their views rather than to correct their views.  Rather than research, people search enough to find something that looks good to them and supports the answer they want as quickly as possible.  Enabling confirmation bias. 

 

Even the news industry supports confirmation bias, by providing sources that support the views of those who fund them.  Combining information and entertainment which keeps people misinformed.

 

Caveats?

This book covers a variety of ways that society has found to confirm biases.  There are more reasons for the death of expertise than those that are listed.  The sources and examples for the book confirm the bias of the author.  Although the death of expertise has caused various problems, it’s uncertain how widespread the death of expertise is.  The way the author explains some ideas, contributes to some of the sources of the death of expertise.    

Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•What is an expert?
•What is the death of expertise? 
•How does American culture think of experts?
•How much should each person know?
•How does division of labor effect the amount knowledge of each person in a society?
•How does information availability effect what people know?  
•What is the relationship between experts and their communities? 
•What do experts think of the public?
•How did the internet affect people’s ability to discuss topics with experts?
•What should be the responsibility of citizens?
•Should experts always be correct?
•What does it mean to be wrong? 
•What is the effect of credentials? 
•What is the effect of peer review?
•What is the Dunning-Kruger Effect? 
•What is metacognition? 
•How do conspiracy theories operate? 
•What is the difference between stereotyping and generalizing? 
•How objective are experts? 
•What does a college graduate mean?
•What is the effect of college as a client-centered experience?
•What does it mean to assume that students and teachers are intellectual and social equals?
•What is the effect of fun classes?
•Who wants to stop grade inflation?
•How are colleges becoming anti-intellectual? 
•Do emotions override facts?
•How to do research? 
•How does the internet affect reading? 
•What are the consequences of bad information?
•How do search engines affect what information spreads? 
•What is the wisdom of crowds? 
•How does Wikipedia operate? 
•Which journal articles are published? 
•How does media create misinformed citizens? 
•What are types of expert failure?
•What are the limits of experts? 
•What is the replicability requirement? 
•What is the difference between an explanation and a prediction? 
•What are parasocial attachments? 
•How do experts and leaders interact?
•What should the responsibility of citizens and experts be?
•How did Covid effect experts? 


Book Details
Edition:                   Second Edition
Publisher:               Oxford University Press
Edition ISBN:         9780197763858
Pages to read:          252
Publication:             2024
1st Edition:              2017
Format:                    eBook 

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    5
Content          5
Overall          5






Wednesday, July 22, 2026

Review of Beloved by Toni Morrison

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Book Club Event = Book List (08/15/2026)


Watch Short Review

Excerpts

“But her brain was not interested in the future.  Loaded with the past and hungry for more, it left her no room to image, let alone plan for, the next day.  Exactly like that afternoon in the wild onions – when one more step was the most she could see of the future.  Other people went crazy, why couldn’t she?  Other people’s brain stopped, turned around and went on to something new, which is what must have happened to Halle.” – Toni Morrison, Chapter I, Page 84


“Unless carefree, motherlove was a killer.  What did he want her pregnant for?  To hold on to her?  have a sign that he passed this way?  He probably had children everywhere anyway.  Eighteen years of roaming, he would have to have dropped a few.  No.  He resented the children she had, that’s what.  Child, she corrected herself.  Child plus Beloved whom she thought of as her own, and that is what he resented.  Sharing her with the girls.  Hearing the three of them laughing at something he wasn’t in on.  The code they used among themselves that he could not break.  Maybe even the time spent on their needs and not his.  They were a family somehow and he was not the head of it.” – Toni Morrison, Chapter I, Page 135


“Grandma Baby said people look down on her because she had eight children with different men.  Coloredpeople and whitepeople both look down on her for that.  Slaves not supposed to have pleasurable feelings on their own; their bodies not supposed to be like that, but they have to have as many children as they can to please whoever owned them.  Still, they were not supposed to have pleasure deep down.  She said for me not to listen to all that.  That I should always listen to my body and love it.” – Toni Morrison, Chapter II, Page 196


Review

Is This An Overview?                                          

Slavery tore families apart.  Belonging together as long as the partners are not sold to another.  Running away is not an effective measure, as there are people seeking to capture runaway slaves.  Staying anywhere too long will get one capture.  To prevent separation, to prevent someone from becoming a slave, difficult decisions are made.  Decisions that represent love to some, but cruelty to others.  Decisions which cause relatives of a runaway slave, to run away.  Physical freedom does little to overcome psychological imprisonment.  Haunted by a ghost of the decision made.  What decision defines the novel?

 

Caveats?

This book is difficult to read.  The context is antediluvian.  The writing style is effective at making the reader share the experience of the people in the era, but the style makes the book difficult to read.  


Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•How does slavery affect family formation?
•What is psychological imprisonment?
•What happened at 124?
•Who is Sethe?
•What does Toni Morrison think of slave owners who think of their slaves as extended family members?
•Who was Baby Suggs?
•Who is Denver?
•What happened to Sethe’s children?
•Why not move to another place?
•Who is Paul D?
•Where slaves allowed to be happy?
•Who is Beloved? 

Book Details
Introduction Author:   HonorĂ©e Fanonne Jeffers
Edition:                   First Vintage International Edition
Publisher:               Vintage Books [Penguin Random House]
Edition ISBN:         9780307388629
Pages to read:          237
Publication:             1987
1st Edition:              2025
Format:                    eBook 

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    1
Content          1
Overall          1






Saturday, July 18, 2026

Review of 101 Theory Drive: A Neuroscientist's Quest for Memory by Terry McDermott

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Genre = Psychology


Watch Short Review

Excerpts

“Given the grim facts, a sense of tragedy looms as science has been able to do precious little to combat neural disorders.  One reason for this failure has been our meager understanding of the cognitive processes that are crippled in the course of the diseases.  This has not been for lack of effort.  Thousands of scientists have spent careers and billions of dollars seeking and largely failing to unearth these secrets.  Sadly, because science has not developed more thorough understandings of how the physical processes of learning and memory are supposed to work, there has been little that could be done to fix those processes when they break.” – Terry McDermott, Chapter One: The Talking Cure, Page 14


“Most of the time, when people attempt to define memory, they speak in metaphors, drawing analogies between memories and filing cabinets, or photographs, or videotape replays.  They might talk about what memories mean and what the loss of them portends.  They almost never talk about what memories actually are.  Why?  The simplest answer is they do not know.” – Terry McDermott, Chapter Two: Seeing, Page 17


“As counterintuitive as it seems, the idea that there would be an active forgetting mechanism right on the cusp of the mechanism that causes memory to occur makes sense.  No one remembers or would want to remember everything.  Walk down the block, go to the corner store, buy a cup of coffee, and go home.  What of that will you want to remember?  Likely very little.  There has to be a way to get rid of stuff.  Sharp waves – in essence, letting the mind wander – seemed a candidate to erase current experience from memory.” – Terry McDermott, Chapter Seven: Everything Falls Apart, Page 146


Review

Is This An Overview?

The science of the brain is complex.  A complexity that prevents an understanding of the cognitive process.  Without an understanding of the brain, there is little to treat neural disorders, or to improve memory and cognitive ability.  Due to the efforts made, discoveries about the brain have been made.  Discoveries such as that the brain is wired to constantly lose information.  That most of the brain uses the same basic circuitry, the same basic neurons.

 

This a book about the search to find the visual trace of memory, the physical changes in the brain when memory is made, an engram.  This is supposed to happen when memory is encoded, the method by which the brain changes shape, a process called long-term potentiation.  The scientists behind the science are competitive.  Competing for grant funds.  Competition that causes tensions to become dramatic, personal, which can at times override the process of science. 

 

Caveats?

This is an eclectic book, with a focus on memory.  This book is part biography, part basic science, part personalities involved in the science, part academic practice, part laboratory practice, part how discoveries are made, part how neurological products are made.  Some parts are for a general audience, but some parts contain technical information about neuroscience.  


Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•What research is done in Lynch’s Lab?
•What is an engram?
•Is there a theory for neuroscience? 
•What is long-term potentiation (LTP)?
•What is available to ameliorate neural disorders?
•How does learning effect evolution?
•What inspired the development of the battery?
•What is known about the brain?
•What are the duties of the private investigator? 
•What is the source of most grant funds?
•Who is Lynch?  What is Lynch’s personality?
•Why is there difficulty in finding information about the brain?
•How is tenure earned?
•What was the consequence of the Cretaceous period? 
•How is the brain wired?
•What is Synaptics?
•How to improve mental performance?
•How are experiments performed? 
•What are clinical trials? 
•What is Cortex?
•What is peer review?

Book Details
Publisher:               Pantheon Books [Random House]
Edition ISBN:         9780375425387
Pages to read:          259
Publication:             2010
1st Edition:              2010
Format:                    Hardcover 

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    4
Content          4
Overall          4






Tuesday, July 14, 2026

Review of What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets by Michael Sandel

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Genre = Economics
Book Club Event = Book List (08/29/2026)


Watch Short Review

Excerpts

“The second reason we should hesitate to put everything up for sale is more difficult to describe.  It is not about inequality and fairness but about the corrosive tendency of markets.  Putting a price on the good things in life can corrupt them.  That’s because markets don’t only allocate goods; they also express and promote certain attitudes toward the goods being exchanged.” – Michael Sandel, Introduction: Markets and Morals, Page 10


“The difference is this: A market economy is a tool – a valuable and effective tool – for organizing productive activity.  A market society is a way of life in which market values seep into every aspect of human endeavor.  It’s a place where social relations are made over in the image of the market.” – Michael Sandel, Introduction: Markets and Morals, Page 11


“The corruption argument, by contrast, focuses on the character of the goods themselves and the norms that should govern them.  So it cannot be met simply by establishing fair bargaining conditions.  Even in a society without unjust differences of power and wealth, there would still be things that money should not buy.  This is because markets are not mere mechanisms; they embody certain values.  And sometimes, market values crowd out nonmarket norms worth caring about.” – Michael Sandel, Chapter 3: How Markets Crowd Out Morals, Page 85


Review

Is This An Overview?

Societies decide what can be put up for sale and what cannot be put on sale.  With the efficiency of markets, market methodology has been dominating culture.  Transitioning a market economy, into a market society.  Within a market economy, the market acts as an effective tool of organizing productive activity.  Within a market society, market values are inherent in everything that is done, with social relations determined by the market.  Markets do more than allocate resources, markets also change the product they regulate, markets change social norms.  There are consequences to transitioning society to become more like a market, by putting more on sale than before.  The consequences are inequality and corruption.

 

As more money is needed to function in a society, the more money matters in society.  When what can be purchased with money is political influence, better health care, education, and safety, the more inequality there will be.  Some assume that the most willing to pay are also the most able to pay.  But ability to pay might not be possible for those most willing to pay. 

 

Putting a price on anything changes its value, can corrupt the product or act.  A price can be a lower mode of valuation than is appropriate to the product or act.  Markets influence attitudes towards what is being exchanged.  Markets override nonmarket values.  Values which are beneficial to society.  Markets override intrinsic motivation with extrinsic motivation.  Markets can train people to only do certain activities when they are paid, which includes activities that would be helpful to themselves or others.  While people tend to be willing to accept certain tasks or decisions as part of civil service, for the public spirit.  People are often not willing to do the same tasks when paid to, as that would constitute bribery.

 

Caveats?

The book is based on examples.  Interest in the examples depends on the reader.  The systemic analysis on the consequences of the commercialization of everything, is spread throughout the book and can sometimes be repetitive.


Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•What are the consequences of transitioning society to market norms?
•How do markets effect inequality?
•How do markets effect values? 
•What do markets do with nonmarket values?
•What is the different between a market economy and a market society?
•What is the difference between willingness to pay and ability to pay?
•What does society think of line jumping?
•What is the line-standing business?
•What are incentives?
•What is Project Prevention? 
•What effect did paying kids for academic activities have?
•How would the market effect refugees? 
•Can apologies be bought?
•Can friends be bought?
•How do gifts function?
•How do markets affect civic duty?
•How do markets affect public goods?
•What is the viatical industry?
•How does monetizing baseball effect the game? 

Book Details
Edition:                   First Edition
Publisher:               Farrar, Straus and Giroux
Edition ISBN:         9781429942584
Pages to read:          152
Publication:             2012
1st Edition:              2012
Format:                    eBook 

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    5
Content          4
Overall          5