There is a laugher that is orderly, and a laughter based on
absurdity. A journalist writes an
article, that breaks no laws. An article
that the authorities acknowledge did no harm.
Yet, deprives the journalist of a job and opportunities. The authorities represent order, which
justifies their desire to forget the person who the article was based on. The authorities agree that nothing serious was
done as the article used a pseudonym, and collected negligible fees. Yet, the journalist becomes an unwelcome
entity in society. An absurd
situation. What happened to the
journalist and what is humorous about the situation?
Questions to Consider while Reading the Book
•What is the raison d’etre of the book? For what purpose did the author write the book? Why do people read this book?
Karel’s mother is not someone who
Karel or Marketa can tolerate for long.
When Karel’s mother seemed miserable, Karel and Marketa wanted to have
Karel’s mother live with them. But
changed their minds after Karel’s mother behaved in a way they could not
tolerate. Karel’s mother seemed petty,
as Karel’s mother was concerned more about the lack of polite social behavior,
rather than what everyone else was concerned about such as the Russian
invasion. But there was sympathy to
Karel’s mother’s view, that the small moments of joy can be a useful
distraction to overcome tragedy.
Karel’s and
Marketa’s relationship has its moments of tension. Both are equally stubborn. What enables them to overcome their burdens,
is their gatherings with Eva. But
Karel’s mother is visiting them, and does not leave when supposed to. This interrupts the plans for the gathering
that releases Karel’s and Marketa’s tensions.
How do Karel and Marketa handle the situation?
Questions to Consider while Reading the Book
•What is the raison d’etre of the book? For what purpose did the author write the book? Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•Who is Karel?
•Who is Marketa?
•Who is Karel’s mother?
•Who is Eva?
•What happens with Karel, Marketa, and Eva?
•What happens during the Karel’s mother’s visit?
•Why do Karel and Marketa want Karels’ mother to leave?
Although the Russian communist party
was initially favorable to Czechoslovakia, they quickly had become no better
than those who they overthrew. People
who share a disagreement with the Russian communist party, are removed from
memory. Removed even from
photographs. No matter their previous
association with the party, or their rank.
People who denounce others survive, with those of higher rank more
likely to be denounced. While those who
can think are denounced, those who cannot think are not promoted.
As the state can
declare any word, any idea, an attack on state security, Mirek decided to put
away potentially compromising papers in a safe place. Mirek was an intellectual who was critical on
political ideas but was protected by the state for being useful. When the Russians arrived, Mirek did not
renounce held convictions, which resulted in a loss of status. Before moving the papers, Mirek wanted to
talk to someone from Mirek’s past. After
a long wait, was able to get in touch with the person. Will Mirek be able to talk to the one Mirek had
been thinking about? What will happen to
the papers?
Questions to Consider while Reading the Book
•What is the raison d’etre of the book? For what purpose did the author write the book? Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•Who is Clementis?
•What is the power of memory?
•Who is Mirek?
•Who is Zdena?
•What was the status of an intellectual?
•How did Germany influence Czechoslovakia?
•What happened to Czechoslovakia when the Russians arrived?
•Is there a difference between someone and their destiny?
A composition of stories about Czechoslovakia.
Stories meant to remind people of the power and value of history, of the
power and value of laughter. Societies
become forgotten, by their people and by others, when their culture is
destroyed. Those in power then rewrite the
society’s history, to suit their needs.
To validate claims of those in power.
People seek power to change the past.
The struggle against power, is a struggle to not forget. By forgetting history, people are kept innocent. Kept incapable of making decisions for
themselves.
The stories are
from a time when Czechoslovakia was invaded by Russia, with Soviet Russia
imposing their ideology on the people.
Seemingly favorable ideas, became destructive to the people of Czechoslovakia. Anyone who disagreed or was in any way
critical of Russian socialist ideology, was removed. Removed from any position held, and removed
from history. Erased from
photographs. Portraying an untainted
society, and a unified political organization.
No alternatives to state accepted claims were tolerated. The stories are about those who in their way,
tried to overcome the persecution methods.
Who laughed as a response to the absurd, or a way to distract
from the tragic situations. Joy is a
valuable tool to the persecuted.
Caveats?
The stories have different
qualities, with interest in the stories depending on the reader. Most stories are for a mature audience, as
there is a lot of sexual content in the book.
Questions to Consider while Reading the Book
•What is the raison d’etre of the book? For what purpose did the author write the book? Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•Which story is your favorite?
•What is the political background of the stories?
•What is the history of Czechoslovakia?
•How did Russia affect Czechoslovakia?
•How did the people change their behavior?
•Are the interactions between men and women representative of behavior?
•What are the advantages and disadvantages of forgetting?