Sunday, January 18, 2026

Review of The Plague by Albert Camus

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Genre = Novel
Book Club Event = Book List (02/28/2026)


Watch Short Review


Excerpts

“One useful way to get to know a city is to find out how people work there, how they love there, and how they die there.  In our little city, perhaps because of the climate, all these things are done together, with the same frenetic and absent attitude.  In other words, people here get bored and concentrate on developing their habits.  Our fellow citizens work hard, but always to make themselves richer.  Above all, they are interested in trade and their first concern, in some form or other, is to do business.” – Albert Camus, Chapter I, Page 8


“When you’re at war, you barely have any idea of what a dead man is.  And since a dead man carries no wight unless you’ve seen him dead, a hundred million corpses strewn across history are nothing but smoke in the imagination.  The doctor remembered the plague of Constantinople, which according to Procopius killed ten thousand victims a day.  Ten thousand dead equaled five times the audience of a large movie theater.  That’s what they should do.  Gather up the people at the exists of five cinemas, take them to a city square, and make them die in piles to see it a little more clearly.  At least then they could put faces they knew to that anonymous pile.” – Albert Camus, Chapter I, Page 30-31


“From that moment on, it’s fair to say the plague concerned us all.  Until then, despite the surprise and worry these strange events had brought, our fellow citizens had pursued their occupations, in the usual way, as much as they were able.  And that would surely continue.  But once the gates were closed, they realized, along with the narrator, that they were caught in the same net and would have to cope with it.  And so, for example, a feeling as individual as separation from a loved one suddenly became, from the earliest weeks on, the feeling of a whole people, and, along with fear, the primary anguish during this long period of exile.” – Albert Camus, Chapter II, Page 48



Review

Is This An Overview?

Rats started to die in public, in the streets.  As more and more rats died, the people went about their business without thinking much about the strange events.  When people started to get sick, the medical community took some notice, and did want to take a minor initiative to prevent more people from getting sick.  But had to go through an authority who did not want to disturb the public, did not think there was a contagion.  As more and more people died, the large quantities of people did not count for much, as they were anonymous, as people care less for the unwitnessed death.

 

When the plague was partially recognized, when the plague could not be readily ignored, it was assumed to be temporary for plague interfered with business, and therefore had no future among the people.  What caused people to concern themselves with the plague, was when the city gates were closed.  The isolation caused people to take notice.  Take notice, but not react to the plague.  As the plague affected the city, there was a paper shortage.  Even with the paper shortage, a new newspaper appeared to inform people of the plague, that quickly transitioned to marketing for products that claimed to prevent the plague.  What will happen to the city?

Caveats?

The writing style has mixed quality.  Sometimes providing psychological observations, other times tedious details.  The mixed quality is a method of providing the diverse perspectives on the plague.


Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•How to get to know the people of a city?
•What kind of treatment do sick people need? 
•Who is the narrator? 
•What happened to the rats of the city?
•How did people respond to the rats of the city?
•What happened when people started to get sick?
•How are the dead counted?
•What happened when plague was recognized?
•How did people recognize that there was a plague? 
•What happened to the city after the quarantine? 
•What was the Courier of the Epidemic?
•What ideas about religion are shared?
•What happened to the public health squads? 
•What happened to crime in the city?
•How did burial ceremony’s change? 
•Did the plague end?

Book Details
Translator:              Lauira Marris
Original Language: French
Translated Into:       English
Publisher:               Borzoi Book [Penguin random House]
Edition ISBN:         9780593318676
Pages to read:          200
Publication:             2021
1st Edition:              1947
Format:                    eBook 

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    4
Content          3
Overall          3






Wednesday, January 14, 2026

Review of The Fearless Organization: Creating Psychological Safety in the Workplace for Learning, Innovation, and Growth by Amy C. Edmondson

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Book Club Event = Book List (02/14/2026)
Intriguing Connections = 1) Why Conflict Occurs And How To Resolve Them?


Watch Short Review

Excerpts

“For an organization to truly thrive in a world where innovation can make the difference between success and failure, it is not enough to hire smart, motivated people.  Knowledgeable, skilled, well-meaning people cannot always contribute what they know at the critical moment on the job when it is needed.  Sometimes this is because they’re reluctant to stand out, be wrong, or offend the boss.  For knowledge work to flourish, the workplace must be one where people feel able to share their knowledge!” – Amy C. Edmondson, Introduction, Page 12-13


“Psychological safety is not immunity from consequence, nor is it a state of high self-regard.  In psychologically safe workplaces, people know they might fail, they might receive performance feedback that says they’re not meeting expectations, and they might lose their jobs due to changes in the industry environment or even to a lack of competence in their role.  These attributes of the modern workplace are unlikely to disappear anytime soon.  But in a psychologically safe workplace, people are not hindered by interpersonal fear.  They feel willing and able to take the inherent interpersonal risks of candor.  They fear holding back their full participation more than they fear sharing a potentially sensitive, threatening, or wrong idea.  The fearless organization is one in which interpersonal fear is minimized so that team and organizational performance can be maximized in a knowledge intensive world.  It is not one devoid of anxiety about the future!” – Amy C. Edmondson, Introduction, Page 14


“Although perhaps an extreme case, the fact is that many managers are sympathetic to the use of power to insist that people achieve certain goals – offering clear metrics and deadlines.  The belief that people may not push themselves hard enough without a clear understanding of the negative consequences of failing to do so is widespread and even taken for granted by many in management roles, along with just as many casual onlookers contemplating human motivation at work.  What many people do not realize is that motivation by fear is indeed highly effective – effective at creating the illusion that goals are being achieved.  It is not effective in ensuring that people bring the creativity, good process, and passion needed to accomplish challenging goals in knowledge-intensive workplaces.” – Amy C. Edmondson, Chapter 3: Avoidable Failure, Page 71


Review

Is This An Overview?

Organizations that depend on intellectual and collaborative tasks need people who are willing to share their knowledge and different views.  But individuals can withhold information when there are costs attached to sharing the information, when the person who shares the information is punished. 

 

There are managers who think that fear can make people work harder.  A culture of fear is effective at creating the illusion that goals are achieved, not to actually achieve goals.  Fear can create silence in people as people do not want to get punished.  Silence is costly to organizations, as individuals can withhold information about mistakes they have made or others are making, and do not share ideas to improve the work process.

 

Within psychologically safe organizations, people are not hindered by interpersonal fear.  Psychologically safe organizations are fearless organizations, as they create conditions that enable individuals to take the risk in sharing sensitive or wrong ideas.  Individuals want to speak up, offer ideas, and ask questions when there is psychological safety. 

 

Psychological safety does not make people immune from consequences, nor enable an avoidance of conflict.  Psychological safety is being able speak about the conflict to find a resolution.  In organizations that use fear to motivate, less mistakes are reported but more mistakes are made.  In organizations that enable psychologically safe conditions, more mistakes are reported but less mistakes are made.  When the mistakes are reported, the mistakes can be corrected. 

 

Caveats?

A complex understanding of what is and is not psychological safety is shared.  The difficulty in developing a fearless organization comes from individuals having different values and culture.  What someone finds to be psychologically safe or unsafe, another person can have a different reaction.  As cultures change, what was considered safe or unsafe changes as well.  Fearless organizations need to find what enables people to share their different views.  


Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•Why would someone not share important information? 
•What is psychological safety?
•How does psychological safety affect meeting times?
•What is a fearless organization?
•What is a culture of fear? 
•What are costs and benefits of staying silent?
•Why do counterproductive workarounds occur?
•How does fear effect the medical community?
•What happened to car emission tests? 
•What were Wells Fargo Motivator reports? 
•What happened to the Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant? 
•What is Pixar’s Braintrust? 

Book Details
Publisher:               John Wiley & Sons
Edition ISBN:         9781119477266
Pages to read:          208
Publication:             2018
1st Edition:              2018
Format:                    eBook 

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    5
Content          5
Overall          5






Saturday, January 10, 2026

Review of The Case For Modern Man by Charles Frankel

 This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Genre = Philosophy
Book Club Event = Book List (01/10/2026)

Watch Short Review

Excerpts

“In modern culture everything is relative and nothing is absolute.  We have no first principles, no ultimate values, no unshakable commitments, no conviction that there is any final meaning to life.  In the end, on any moral issue, we have no alternative but merely to shrug our shoulders and express a preference – for freedom or toleration if we happen to feel that way, or for tyranny and the persecution of minorities if we happen to feel differently.  As a result, our homes are without disciple, our schools without clear purposes, our foreign policy weak and spineless.  There is cynicism in our personal moralities, opportunism in our politics, and a general sense of aimlessness and drift in our daily lives.” – Charles Frankel, Chapter IV: The Anxiety To Believe, Page 48



“History has to be seen as a series of achievements and failures which are meaningful because they serve some purpose and exhibit some truth that lies beyond history itself.  For history cannot be an end in itself.  The career of mankind is meaningless unless we see it against the backdrop of what is timeless” – Charles Frankel, Chapter IV: The Anxiety To Believe, Page 50


“In fact, all knowledge is selective.  If we insist, on the basis of this truism, that all knowledge is therefore biased, we imply that we can never learn the objective facts about anything until we are omniscient.  More, we contradict the very idea of knowledge.  For all knowledge involves generalizations, and therefore abstractions.  By its very nature, then, it is selective, and if it were not selective it would not be knowledge.  When we apply the term “biased” to our beliefs merely because they are selective, we are using the term “biased” in such a way that the distinction between being biased and being unbiased loses all meaning.“ – Charles Frankel, Chapter VII: Can History Tell The Trust?, Page 134


Review

Is This An Overview?

History becomes meaningful when compared to changes made through time.  Changes that provide information on what was effective and what was harmful.  Knowledge derived from that information can be used to prevent further errors of judgment.  Knowledge derived is always biased, always selective.  Knowledge is a tool, that can be used to harm humankind but also improve the human condition.  How that knowledge is used is part of the social contract that enables individuals to cooperate effectively as a collective.  Liberal values enable people to become aware of their biases, to challenge the views of others, and improve society through the competition of differences. 

 

Caveats?

This book is about liberalism.  How liberal values are effective, and the contradictions that liberal values produced.  Correcting for the contradictions.  The claims and assumptions are based on the author’s liberal bias, which makes liberalism seem as the favored social ideology.  There is validity to various claims made, but the claims might not be generalizable.


Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•Is reason for improving or harming humankind?
•What are universal points of view?
•What is the social contract? 
•What is liberalism?
•How does liberalism handle history?
•What is the consequence of everything being relative? 
•How is knowledge used?
•What are biases?
•What do social institutions have to do with each other? 
•What is objectivity? 


Book Details
Publisher:               Harper & Brothers
Edition ISBN:         9781199637154
Pages to read:          209
Publication:             1956
1st Edition:              1956
Format:                    Hardcover 

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    3
Content          3
Overall          3