This book review was written by Eugene Kernes

“That evening Marie came by to see me and asked me if I wanted to marry her. I said it didn’t make any difference to me and that we could if she wanted to. Then she wanted to know if I loved her. I answered the same way I had the last time, that it didn’t mean anything but that I probably didn’t love her. “So why marry me, then?” She said. I explained to her that it didn’t really matter and that if she wanted to, we could get married. Besides, she was the one who was doing the asking and all I was saying was yes” – Albert Camus, Part 1: Chapter 5, Page 40
“Whether it was now or twenty years from now, I would still be the one dying. At that point, what would disturb my train of thought was the terrifying leap I would feel my heart take at the idea of having twenty more years of life ahead of me. But I simply had to stifle it by imagining what I’d be thinking in twenty years when it would all come down to the same thing anyway. Since we’re all going to die, it’s obvious that when and how don’t matter.” – Albert Camus, Part 2: Chapter 5, Page 89
Elaborate Description
Is This An Overview?
The protagonist is passive, allowing life to happen to the
protagonist, and adapting to what does happen.
Expresses oneself through logic, lacks emotional empathy, and is
honest. Personality traits which make
the protagonist difficult for others to understand, traits that make the
protagonist a stranger to others.
The death of the protagonist’s mother, does not cause
distress, but does allow some time from work.
Time that enables the protagonist to meet a former colleague, Marie,
with both mutually wanting to spend time together. Even willing to take Marie to spend time at a
beach house due to a request from an acquaintance, Raymond, who the protagonist
helped before. Raymond did want to
reward the protagonist for the help, but also wanted some extra people for
protection, in case the people who were antagonistic to Raymond showed up.
The antagonists showed up, which led to the protagonist
murdering one of them. The protagonist
is put on trial. The trial appears to be
more about punishing the protagonist for not validating cultural expectations of
how to treat a mother, rather than be about the murder. The protagonist usually is willing to let
others speak on the protagonist’s behalf, but there were instances during the
trial, which the protagonist wanted to speak for oneself but was not allowed to
speak. Why would the protagonist commit
the murder? What is the outcome of the
trial?
Caveats?
This book is more about the philosophy of cultural
expectations, than the narrative. A
reflection on how people want others to behave.
The events that lead to the trial, and the trial itself have their
narrative limitations. The events and
trial are more for drama, tools used to express a cultural criticism.
Book Details
Pages to read: 88
Publication: 2012
1st Edition: 1946
Format: eBook
Ratings out of 5:
Readability 5
Content 3
Overall 3