Monday, September 29, 2025

Review of An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding by David Hume

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Book Club Event = Book List (12/06/2025)


Watch Short Review

Excerpts

“Man is a reasonable being; and as such, receives from science his proper food and nourishment: But so narrow are the bounds of human understanding, that little satisfaction can be hoped for in this particular, either from the extent of security or his acquisitions.  Man is a sociable, no less than a reasonable being: But neither can he always enjoy company agreeable and amusing, or preserve the proper relish for them.  Man is also an active being; and from that disposition, as well as from the various necessities of human life, must submit to business and occupation: But the mind requires some relaxation, and cannot always support its bent to care and industry.” – David Hume, Section I: Of the Different Species of Philosophy, Page 8


“Nothing is more free than the imagination of man; and though it cannot exceed that original stock of ideas furnished by the internal and external senses, it has unlimited power of mixing, compounding, separating, and dividing these ideas, in all the varieties of fiction and vision.  It can feign a train of events, with all the appearance of reality, ascribe to them a particular time and place, conceive them as existent, and paint them out to itself with every circumstance, that belongs to any historical fact, which it believes with the greatest certainty.” – David Hume, Section V: Sceptical Solution of these Doubts, Page 40


“The great advantage of the mathematical sciences above the moral consists in this, that the ideas of the former, being sensible, are always clear and determinate, the smallest distinction between them is immediately perceptible, and the same terms are still expressive of the same ideas, without ambiguity or variation.  An oval is never mistaken for a circle, nor an hyperbola for an ellipsis.  The isosceles and scalenum are distinguished by boundaries more exact than vice and virtue, right and wrong.” – David Hume, Section VII: Of the Idea of Necessary Connexion, Page 53


Review

Is This An Overview?

Methods of science develop human society, but people are bound to narrow understandings.  People have their biases, and nature limits self-control.  The mind wants activity, but also moments of relaxation.  People can image vast fictions and believe them to be reality.  While mathematical sciences can form relations which never change, moral sciences maintain ambiguity.  Logic is based on operations of the mind, for abstract ideas do not exist in nature.  Experience teaches the cause and effect between variables.  That the same causes have the same effects.  Chance is dependent on ignorance of causes for events.  Science can overcome controversy through experimentation, through trust in past experiences.   

 

Caveats?

This book can be difficult to read due to antediluvian examples and explanations.  Various ideas presented have been updated.  Some ideas still hold, others have been proven false.  


Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•What is science to people?
•How active is a person?
•Where is logic found?
•What is induction? 
•What effect do passions have on the mind?
•What is the difference between fiction and belief? 
•What are the limits to imagination? 
•What is chance and probability?
•What is the difference between mathematical and moral sciences?
•How much self-command do people have?
•What is the source of controversy? 
•What is the effect of miracles? 


Book Details
Publisher:               Open Road Integrated Media
Edition ISBN:         9781504063760
Pages to read:          134
Publication:             2020
1st Edition:              1748
Format:                    eBook 

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    1
Content          2
Overall          1






Thursday, September 25, 2025

Review of The Confidence Trap: A History of Democracy in Crisis from World War I to the Present by David Runciman

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Genre = Politics
Book Club Event = Book List (12/20/2025)
Intriguing Connections = 1) To Cooperate Or To Defect?, 2) Why Do People Think Differently?


Watch Short Review

Excerpts

“The factors that make democracy work successfully over time – the flexibility, the variety, the responsiveness of democratic societies – are the same factors that cause democracies to go wrong.  They produce impulsiveness, and short-termism, and historical myopia.  Successful democracies have blind spots, which cause them to drift into disaster.  You cannot have the good of democratic progress without the bad of democratic drift.” – David Runciman, Preface, Page XV


“Newspaper hysteria was only part of the general problem: crisis might be good for a democracy, but democracies are not good at recognizing crises.  They overreact; they underreact; they lack a sense of proportion.  That is why it was so hard to know what sort of crisis would enable a democracy to learn its lesson.  If the crisis turned out to be so bad that no one could doubt it was real, then there was always a risk that it would end in disaster.  If it did not end in disaster, then there was always a risk that it would be filed along with the other overblown crises of democratic life as a false alarm.  And even the real crises – the ones no one could doubt – were hard to learn from.  If democracy doesn’t survive, you’ve learned your lesson, but at an unacceptable cost.  If democracy does survive, then you may learn the lesson that democracy can survive any crisis.  Instead of making you wise, recovering from your mistakes can make you reckless.” – David Runciman, Introduction: Tocqueville: Democracy and Crisis, Page 25


“In a crisis, elections can be a godsend or a curse.  They are a godsend if they provide a chance to ditch the people responsible for the mess.  They are a curse if they make it impossible for anyone to take the tough decisions needed to get out of the mess for fear of being turfed out by the voters.” – David Runciman, Chapter 7: 2008: Back to the Future, Page 278


Review

Is This An Overview?

Different forms of government have their advantages and disadvantages.  An advantage of autocracies and aristocracies is that they can respond to a crisis quicky and decisively with long-term agendas.  The disadvantage is that once those decisions have been made, the people are stuck with those decisions as the leaders lack adaptation methods.  A disadvantage of democracies is that they have difficulty coordinating action on short-term notice.  The advantage is that democracies are constantly experimenting, finding different ways to overcome a challenge. 

 

Democracies are better equipped to overcome long-term problems due to methods of adaptation, but being able to adapt does not make democracies any wiser than before.  Overcoming a crisis through adaptation can teach the wrong lesson, that the democracy can overcome any crisis.  Successfully overcoming a crisis makes democracies complacent to problems, and behave recklessly for the assumption is that problems could be overcome.  Recklessness, complacency, failure to take action to correct a problem, creates crises.  This is democracy’s confidence trap.  For confidence in being able to overcome a crisis, creates the crisis.  While past crises have been overcome, that does not mean knowing that adaptation is possible to a future challenge. 

 

Possibility of adaptation comes from elections.  Elected officials need to change their minds to stay in power, unlike unelected officials who are afraid of public opinion as they seek to control public opinion.  Elections are a tool that can be used as an opportunity to remove those who are making mistakes and change the ideas being used.  But elections can also prevent officials from making tough decisions for fear of how the voters will respond.  Officials are quick to change decisions, which develops a myopic political situation.  The future of democracy is evanescent, for no democratic behavior is representative of what the democracy will do in the future.

 

Caveats?

Although various democracies are represented, as the author acknowledged, the focus is on the democracy of United States of America. 

 

The author reflects on various commentators of democracy.  The interpretations often lack background information about the content of the claims, and different people can have different interpretations of the claims than those provided by the author.  


Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•What is the confidence trap?
•What are the advantages and disadvantages of democracy?
•What is democratic complacency?
•What did Tocqueville think of American politics?
•What are the criticisms of democracy?  
•How do the news effect democracy? 
•What do democracies think of war?
•What crisis did democracy face during 1918?
•What did the Bolsheviks think of American democracy?
•What crisis did democracy face during 1933?
•What crisis did democracy face during 1947?
•What crisis did democracy face during 1974?
•What crisis did democracy face during 1989?
•What is The End Of History?
•Is Japan a democracy? 
•What crisis did democracy face during 2008?

Book Details
Publisher:               Princeton University Press
Edition ISBN:         9780691148687
Pages to read:          339
Publication:             2013
1st Edition:              2013
Format:                    Hardcover 

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    5
Content          5
Overall          5






Monday, September 22, 2025

Review of Being and Nothingness by Jean-Paul Sartre

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Genre = Philosophy
Book Club Event = Book List (10/18/2025)
Intriguing Connections = 1) Get To Know The Peoples Of The World (France), 


Watch Short Review

Excerpts

“Pleasure cannot be distinguished – even logically – from the consciousness of pleasure.  The consciousness (of) pleasure is constitutive of pleasure, as its very mode of existence, as the matter of which it is made, and not as a form that is subsequently imposed on some hedonic matter.  Pleasure cannot exist “before” any consciousness of pleasure – not even in virtual form, or as a potentiality.  A potential pleasure can exist only as a consciousness (of) its potentiality; there are no virtualities in consciousness that are not conscious of being virtual.” –   Jean-Paul Sartre, Introduction: III: The Prereflective Cogito And The Being Of The Percipere, Page 82


“We cannot find or disclose nothingness in the way we can find or disclose a being.  Nothingness is always an elsewhere.  It is the for-itself’s obligation never to exist except in the form of an “elsewhere” in relation to itself, to exist as a being that is constantly qualified by its own inconsistency in being.  This inconsistency, moreover, does not involve another being; it is only a constant referral from itself to itself, from the reflection to the reflecting, from the reflecting to the reflection.” – Jean-Paul Sartre, Part Two: Chapter 1: I Self-Presence, Page 181


“I exist my body: that is its first dimension of being.  My body is used and is known by the Other: that is its second dimension.  But, insofar as I am for the Other, the Other is disclosed to me as the subject for whom I am an object.  That is even my fundamental relation with the Other, as we have seen.  I exist therefore for myself as known by the Other – and, in particular, in my very facticity.  I exist for myself as known by the Other in the capacity of a body.  That is the third ontological dimension of my body.” – Jean-Paul Sartre, Part Three: Chapter 2: III: The Third Ontological Dimension Of The Body, Page 474


Review

Is This An Overview?

What gives life meaning are the choices people make.  Choices for which each person is responsible for.  The ability to choose is what defines freedom.  Freedom is not necessarily logical, as choices are not necessarily logical.  Choices made contribute to defining who a person is.  But a person is defined by more than the choices being made, as society, history, and environment shape the person.  Other people can prevent choices.  Freedom to act, is not the same as freedom of being. 

 

Being is contingent of itself.  Being is not derived from something possible.  Nothingness is a negation of being.  Nothing is relative to being, nothingness is a reflection of a reflection.  Being can be found, being has a presence, but nothingness is always an elsewhere.  Value is contingent on being.  Choices have value as they are made in the present.  The past is evanescent, something that resembles values, but is not value.  The future is an illusion, for the future cannot be its own project.  The future is a nothingness, as the future constantly changes by the choices made in the present. 

 

Caveats?

This book can be very difficult to read.  The book is filled with various philosophical concepts and jargon.  There are various reflections on ideas from other philosophers, without providing an appropriate explanation or context for the ideas from other philosophers.  The reader would need the have a broad philosophical background to understand the information presented in the book.  Information and ideas which have been updated and improved upon since the publication of the book.  


Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•What is being?
•What is nothingness?
•What is consciousness? 
•What is faith?  What is bad faith?
•What is the past? 
•What is the future?
•What are the dimensions of the body?
•What is shame?
•What is freedom?

Book Details
Foreword Author:   Richard Moran
Translator:              Sarah Richmond
Original Language: French
Translated Into:       English
Publisher:               Washington Square Press [Simon & Schuster]
Edition ISBN:         9781982105464
Pages to read:          784
Publication:             2021
1st Edition:              1943
Format:                    eBook 

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    1
Content          1
Overall          1






Saturday, September 20, 2025

Review of The Border (Part Seven) by Milan Kundera

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Intriguing Connections = 1) Get To Know The Peoples Of The World (Czechoslovakia), 


Watch Short Review

Review

Is This An Overview?

Not everyone acts their age, or at least what culture expects from someone of an age.  Behavior changes when someone ages, when they are reaching a border.  Physical and psychological.  Jan is leaving town, and becomes willing to participate in an event that has previously been avoided.  The event contains features that are beyond cultural expectations.  What does culture expect of people?

 

Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•To whom would you suggest the book?
•Is there an appropriate behavior for a specific age?
•Who is Barbara? 
•Who are the Clevis’s family?
•Who is Jan?
•How is culture changing?  

Book Details
Translator:              Aaron Asher
Original Language: French
Translated Into:       English
Publisher:               Perennial Classics [HarperCollins Publishers]
Edition ISBN:         9780063290693
Pages to read:          30
Publication:             2023
1st Edition:              1978
Format:                    eBook 

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    4
Content          1
Overall          1






 

Monday, September 15, 2025

Review of The Angels (Part Six) by Milan Kundera

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Intriguing Connections = 1) Get To Know The Peoples Of The World (Czechoslovakia), 


Watch Short Review

Review

Is This An Overview?

Tamina is frustrated at the café.  No longer does Tamina have the patience to listen to customers.  One day, Tamina disappeared.  Left the café, without notice.  Not even the police found Tamina.  Tamina was taken, voluntarily, to an island.  An island filled with children.  Although hesitant to participate in the children’s games, eventually participated to gain their friendship.  But friendship is tenuous, as moments of joy oscillated with hostility.  The children are innocent as they are not burdened with memory.  What happens to Tamina at the island filled children? 


Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•Who is Tamina?
•How did Tamina change?
•Where did Tamina go?
•Who are the Squirrels?
•How did Tamina interact with the children?
•What happened when Tamina helped the children with the games?
•What is the outcome of memory on a person?


Book Details

Translator:              Aaron Asher
Original Language: French
Translated Into:       English
Publisher:               Perennial Classics [HarperCollins Publishers]
Edition ISBN:         9780063290693
Pages to read:          28
Publication:             2023
1st Edition:              1978
Format:                    eBook 

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    5
Content          2
Overall          2






 

Sunday, September 14, 2025

Review of Litost (Part Five) by Milan Kundera

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Intriguing Connections = 1) Get To Know The Peoples Of The World (Czechoslovakia), 


Watch Short Review

Review

Is This An Overview?

Litost is a state of torment after reflecting on one’s own misery.  Such as when finding out that a loved one has their own capabilities, history, and spend their attention on something else.  Kristyna is married, but is enamored with a student.  A medical condition makes Kristyna struggle with a choice to be with the student, while the student cannot understand Kristyna’s hesitation. 

 

The student is a poet, who has an opportunity to attend a rare event.  An event that features popular poets who face Russian persecution.  An event held at the same time as a visit from Kristyna.  The student would prefer to spend the time with Kristyna, but Kristyna understands the significance of the event and therefore wants the student to attend the event.  What happens to the relationship between Kristyna and the student? 


Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•What is Litost?
•ho is Kristyna?
•What is Kristyna’s relationship with the butcher?
•What is Kristyna’s relationship with the student?
•What is Kristyna’s medical condition?
•How to overcome misery?
•Who is the narrator?
•Who is Voltaire?
•What happens at the poets event?
•What was Petrarch story?
•What compromises are being made in the story? 

Book Details

Translator:              Aaron Asher
Original Language: French
Translated Into:       English
Publisher:               Perennial Classics [HarperCollins Publishers]
Edition ISBN:         9780063290693
Pages to read:          31
Publication:             2023
1st Edition:              1978
Format:                    eBook 

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    5
Content          2
Overall          3






 

Saturday, September 13, 2025

Review of Lost Letters (Part Four) by Milan Kundera

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Intriguing Connections = 1) Get To Know The Peoples Of The World (CzechoslovakiaRussia), 




Watch Short Review

Review

Is This An Overview?

Tamina works at a café, and has skills that garner the attention of the customers.  The customers want to talk to Tamina, because Tamina appears to be listening attentively.  Tamina had escaped Russia occupied Czechoslovakia, but wants some notebooks that were left behind.  Notebooks in a parcel, hidden in the home of Tamina’s mother-in-law.  Tamina cannot go back, but wants the parcel.  Tamina attempts various strategies to get someone to go to Czechoslovakia to get Tamina’s parcel.  What is Tamina willing to do to have someone get the parcel?  Why does the parcel matter to Tamina?

 

Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•Who is Tamina? 
•Why do people want to talk to Tamina?
•What does Tamina want the parcel?
•Where is the parcel supposed to be?
•What does Tamina’s mother-in-law know about the parcel? 
•Why and how did Tamina leave Czechoslovakia?
•How does Tamina attempt to retrieve the parcel? 
•Who is Bibi?
•Who is Banaka? 


Book Details

Translator:              Aaron Asher
Original Language: French
Translated Into:       English
Publisher:               Perennial Classics [HarperCollins Publishers]
Edition ISBN:         9780063290693
Pages to read:          30
Publication:             2023
1st Edition:              1978
Format:                    eBook 

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    5
Content          3
Overall          3






Friday, September 12, 2025

Review of The Angels (Part Three) by Milan Kundera

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Intriguing Connections = 1) Get To Know The Peoples Of The World (CzechoslovakiaRussia), 


Watch Short Review

Review

Is This An Overview?

There is a laugher that is orderly, and a laughter based on absurdity.  A journalist writes an article, that breaks no laws.  An article that the authorities acknowledge did no harm.  Yet, deprives the journalist of a job and opportunities.  The authorities represent order, which justifies their desire to forget the person who the article was based on.  The authorities agree that nothing serious was done as the article used a pseudonym, and collected negligible fees.  Yet, the journalist becomes an unwelcome entity in society.  An absurd situation.  What happened to the journalist and what is humorous about the situation?

 


Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•What are the different types of laughter? 
•Who is Mr. Kundera?
•Who is the journalist?
•Who is the narrator?
•What article did the journalist write?
•What did the authorities think of the article? 
•What did society think of the article? 

Book Details

Translator:              Aaron Asher
Original Language: French
Translated Into:       English
Publisher:               Perennial Classics [HarperCollins Publishers]
Edition ISBN:         9780063290693
Pages to read:          20
Publication:             2023
1st Edition:              1978
Format:                    eBook 

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    5
Content          2
Overall          2






Thursday, September 11, 2025

Review of Mama (Part Two) by Milan Kundera

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Intriguing Connections = 1) Get To Know The Peoples Of The World (Czechoslovakia), 


Watch Short Review

Review

Is This An Overview?

Karel’s mother is not someone who Karel or Marketa can tolerate for long.  When Karel’s mother seemed miserable, Karel and Marketa wanted to have Karel’s mother live with them.  But changed their minds after Karel’s mother behaved in a way they could not tolerate.  Karel’s mother seemed petty, as Karel’s mother was concerned more about the lack of polite social behavior, rather than what everyone else was concerned about such as the Russian invasion.  But there was sympathy to Karel’s mother’s view, that the small moments of joy can be a useful distraction to overcome tragedy.

 

Karel’s and Marketa’s relationship has its moments of tension.  Both are equally stubborn.  What enables them to overcome their burdens, is their gatherings with Eva.  But Karel’s mother is visiting them, and does not leave when supposed to.  This interrupts the plans for the gathering that releases Karel’s and Marketa’s tensions.  How do Karel and Marketa handle the situation?

                                                                                 

Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•Who is Karel?
•Who is Marketa?
•Who is Karel’s mother?
•Who is Eva?
•What happens with Karel, Marketa, and Eva?
•What happens during the Karel’s mother’s visit? 
•Why do Karel and Marketa want Karels’ mother to leave?
•What is the effect of jealousy? 

Book Details

Translator:              Aaron Asher
Original Language: French
Translated Into:       English
Publisher:               Perennial Classics [HarperCollins Publishers]
Edition ISBN:         9780063290693
Pages to read:          23
Publication:             2023
1st Edition:              1978
Format:                    eBook 

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    5
Content          2
Overall          2






Wednesday, September 10, 2025

Review of Lost Letters (Part One) by Milan Kundera

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Intriguing Connections = 1) Get To Know The Peoples Of The World (CzechoslovakiaRussia), 


Watch Short Review

Review

Is This An Overview?

Although the Russian communist party was initially favorable to Czechoslovakia, they quickly had become no better than those who they overthrew.  People who share a disagreement with the Russian communist party, are removed from memory.  Removed even from photographs.  No matter their previous association with the party, or their rank.  People who denounce others survive, with those of higher rank more likely to be denounced.  While those who can think are denounced, those who cannot think are not promoted. 

 

As the state can declare any word, any idea, an attack on state security, Mirek decided to put away potentially compromising papers in a safe place.  Mirek was an intellectual who was critical on political ideas but was protected by the state for being useful.  When the Russians arrived, Mirek did not renounce held convictions, which resulted in a loss of status.  Before moving the papers, Mirek wanted to talk to someone from Mirek’s past.  After a long wait, was able to get in touch with the person.  Will Mirek be able to talk to the one Mirek had been thinking about?  What will happen to the papers?  


Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•Who is Clementis? 
•What is the power of memory?
•Who is Mirek?
•Who is Zdena?
•What was the status of an intellectual?  
•How did Germany influence Czechoslovakia?
•What happened to Czechoslovakia when the Russians arrived? 
•Is there a difference between someone and their destiny?
•Why do people want power? 

Book Details

Translator:              Aaron Asher
Original Language: French
Translated Into:       English
Publisher:               Perennial Classics [HarperCollins Publishers]
Edition ISBN:         9780063290693
Pages to read:          19
Publication:             2023
1st Edition:              1978
Format:                    eBook 

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    5
Content          5
Overall          5






Tuesday, September 9, 2025

Review of The Book of Laughter and Forgetting by Milan Kundera

This book review was written by Eugene Kernes   

Book can be found in: 
Book Club Event = Book List (11/08/2025)
Intriguing Connections = 1) Get To Know The Peoples Of The World (Czechoslovakia, Russia), 


Watch Short Review

Review

Is This An Overview?

A composition of stories about Czechoslovakia.  Stories meant to remind people of the power and value of history, of the power and value of laughter.  Societies become forgotten, by their people and by others, when their culture is destroyed.  Those in power then rewrite the society’s history, to suit their needs.  To validate claims of those in power.  People seek power to change the past.  The struggle against power, is a struggle to not forget.  By forgetting history, people are kept innocent.  Kept incapable of making decisions for themselves.   

 

The stories are from a time when Czechoslovakia was invaded by Russia, with Soviet Russia imposing their ideology on the people.  Seemingly favorable ideas, became destructive to the people of Czechoslovakia.  Anyone who disagreed or was in any way critical of Russian socialist ideology, was removed.  Removed from any position held, and removed from history.  Erased from photographs.  Portraying an untainted society, and a unified political organization.  No alternatives to state accepted claims were tolerated.  The stories are about those who in their way, tried to overcome the persecution methods.  Who laughed as a response to the absurd, or a way to distract from the tragic situations.  Joy is a valuable tool to the persecuted. 

 

Caveats?

The stories have different qualities, with interest in the stories depending on the reader.  Most stories are for a mature audience, as there is a lot of sexual content in the book.  


Questions to Consider while Reading the Book

•What is the raison d’etre of the book?  For what purpose did the author write the book?  Why do people read this book?
•What are some limitations of the book?
•To whom would you suggest this book?
•Which story is your favorite?
•What is the political background of the stories?
•What is the history of Czechoslovakia?
•How did Russia affect Czechoslovakia? 
•How did the people change their behavior?
•Are the interactions between men and women representative of behavior?
•What are the advantages and disadvantages of forgetting?
•What effect does laughing have?
•How do people influence each other?


Book Details

Translator:              Aaron Asher
Original Language: French
Translated Into:       English
Publisher:               Perennial Classics [HarperCollins Publishers]
Edition ISBN:         9780063290693
Pages to read:          180
Publication:             2023
1st Edition:              1978
Format:                    eBook 

Ratings out of 5:
Readability    5
Content          3
Overall          3